Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lcam84

lcam84

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 14, 2018, 7:00 PM UTC
HN karma
254
Public activity
100 items

About lcam84

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30159781

    One problem is that economic growth has a big correlation with carbon emissions. https://eeb.org/library/decoupling-debunked/ Environmental decoupling is the notion that we can hav…

  2. comment
    Comment #30155576

    "Unless the people benefit, economic growth is a subsidy for the rich." —Richard Falk, “Post-Mubarak Revolutionary Chances,” Al Jazeera, 22 Feb. 2011

  3. comment
    Comment #30035451

    Didn't said that we can substitute industrial ammonia but it could definitely reduce it's use. Changing the way we eat it's definitely an opportunity to reduce major sources of c02…

  4. comment
    Comment #30035047

    We could avoid this number by investing in soil preservation, nitrogen fixing plants, reduce meat consumption, even in concepts like humanure.

  5. comment
    Comment #30034926

    There are ethical ways to implement it for instance give more education to women [1]. Consuming less meat should be a priority for us wealthy countries. Overpopulation is a problem…

  6. comment
    Comment #30034895

    The story of Fritz Haber first wife is very sad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clara_Immerwahr

  7. comment
    Comment #29862043

    >It’s a common fallacy of tech people to think that all problems are of a technical nature, and that if we could just have the right technology they would go away and we would be l…

  8. comment
    Comment #29841295

    Urea comes from the Harber process [1] Basically most of food fertilizer depends on fossil fuels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process

  9. comment
    Comment #29252141

    In Portugal is "Sociedade do Cansaço" which translates to "fatigue society"

  10. comment
    Comment #29251877

    I agree although I would add that many of the creative jobs although technically challenging have useless or even destructive goals. Just look at the attention economy and the surv…

  11. comment
    Comment #29094717

    Also we could redistribute the tax as a sort of UBI. This way not only product that pollute would be more expensive, people would have the ability to say no to crappy jobs.

  12. comment
    Comment #28898959

    Yes, the author focuses on a possible shortage of resources as the cause of the problem, but the Forester effect certainly played a decisive role in the case of the chip shortage. …

  13. story
  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #28492621

    Is on this kind of measures where jevons paradox or the rebound effect kicks in. We will inclined to eat more meat because is more sustainable, and with that we neutralize the gain…

  16. comment
    Comment #28378688

    I loved the "good parts” of JS back in 2010. I think I don't need most of this new syntax and yet sometimes have the feeling I'm losing the train when I see this “C#” code base. Cu…

  17. comment
    Comment #28372793

    If you want to explore this you can watch "the century of self" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnPmg0R1M04

  18. comment
    Comment #28371783

    As Ursula Le Guin, I'm not an economist, but I live in one. Didn't mean to be literal, but I find ironic the use of the term, because it reminds me of rough which in portuguese, my…

  19. comment
    Comment #28371262

    I don't think everyone agrees that growth is a problem. Is the way our societies are organized and it is very difficult to reason against it. Another aspect that western societies …

  20. comment
    Comment #28370813

    There is a difference between wants and needs. You have a giant industry trying to change your wants, making sure you are not satisfied with what you have.

  21. comment
    Comment #28370769

    Gross Domestic Product, is a very gross way to measure progress as the name implies. Robert Kennedy said in respect of GDP “It measures everything, in short, except that which make…

  22. comment
    Comment #28370646

    This would be true if we didn't account for the extreme inequality of the system. For instance the richest 1 percent more than double the emissions of the poorest half of humanity …

  23. comment
    Comment #28369031

    Yes, by any measure - infant mortality, safety from war, education, access to culture, etc - we have never been better but all evidence suggests that our lifestyles are not sustain…

  24. comment
    Comment #28368778

    Again I don’t want to romanticize the pandemic but we should critically analyze what happened. When I talk about the system changes, I’m referring to the paper that I wrote in the …

  25. comment
    Comment #28368417

    It’s really interesting to think about what caused last year's systemic change. I think that was the fact that the illness threatened our life directly, but most of all the consequ…