Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — lambdapie

lambdapie

HN member
Joined
Tue, Oct 13, 2015, 7:42 AM UTC
HN karma
89
Public activity
45 items

About lambdapie

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #10497541

    Inefficient compared to what? The choice is not between "publicize the info" and "let insiders trade", its between insider trading and no insider trading, and the information stays…

  2. comment
    Comment #10497456

    Maybe some do, but there is a distinction between intentionally making people feel bad about themselves, and advertisements that simply holding up some look or personality as attra…

  3. comment
    Comment #10497430

    I know plenty of attractive/cool/popular people, who get hundreds of likes, and don't claim to fit this victim narrative.

  4. comment
    Comment #10496839

    When high level behavior that can be described by simple equations emerges from low level laws, we call it physics. When it doesn't, we call it chemistry, biology, geology, etc. (E…

  5. comment
    Comment #10496775

    Some people are more attractive, cooler, more interesting, than others. It's not some evil plot by the corporations to make us feel bad about ourselves. These people are really out…

  6. comment
    Comment #10496663

    Ok that's reasonable. I agree that in theory this argument makes sense. In practice I think the arguments that insider trading is inefficient are compelling enough (see https://new…

  7. comment
    Comment #10490581

    Why is free market in scare quotes? And why "so-called"?

  8. comment
    Comment #10489986

    I'm not a big fan of professional bodies or mandatory qualifications. I think these tend towards rent seeking, with these bodies existing mainly to justify their own existence. In …

  9. comment
    Comment #10489970

    Economically putting up barriers for the sake of it (aside from valid issues of qualification required for the public good) is bad policy. It's good for the people who can get the …

  10. comment
    Comment #10489584

    No, but I'd still recommend looking into content security policy (CSP), iframes, and the sandboxed attribute. Even though you seem to have developed your own notion of what isolati…

  11. comment
    Comment #10489219

    WebAssembly binary will be syntactically (almost) identical to asm.js, which is a subset of JS. So all are equally transparent/opaque.

  12. comment
    Comment #10489211

    You can run untrusted code in an iframe (possibly with the sandbox attribute set). I think this would be what you're looking for.

  13. comment
    Comment #10487779

    Some other commenters have correctly pointed out that (1) my comment doesn't address whether the liquidity costs outweigh the benefits of extra information, and (2) why insider is …

  14. comment
    Comment #10487714

    I didn't understand that article, probably because I'm unfamiliar with the author's other works. Is he proposing that a company be allowed to set rules regarding insider trading du…

  15. comment
    Comment #10487626

    You are right that "harming" someone is not a sufficient reason to ban an action. And as others have pointed out, researching a company carefully causes the same kind of "harm", an…

  16. comment
    Comment #10487593

    I wouldn't say that I ignored the benefit or a more accurate price, since I explicitly mentioned this benefit twice. But I wasn't clear enough of the implications. To clarify: insi…

  17. comment
    Comment #10487100

    What does "if he's going to stray from the South Asian beat" refer to?

  18. comment
    Comment #10487084

    Insider trading does harm people, and does reduce liquidity. Many people who understand classical economics get this wrong [0], because financial markets are a very degenerate kind…

  19. comment
    Comment #10442566

    You use the term "monetary velocity" as if it was some term of trade, but I have a PhD in economics and I've never seen it used this way. Are you referring to a specific school of …

  20. comment
    Comment #10442525

    I don't understand your point. Can you clarify? For reference, when I speak of "marginal effective tax rate" I mean the marginal effective tax rate after including (1) welfare paym…

  21. comment
    Comment #10442438

    UBI might be a great policy, but your argument makes no sense from an accounting point of view. Every kind of redistribution must sum to zero across all people. Basic income is no …

  22. comment
    Comment #10442434

    Basic income is just classical economics rebranded, and basic income is not drastically different from welfare systems that are simple, rule based, and have minimal compliance moni…

  23. comment
    Comment #10436845

    Do you think this also implies that men have more incentive to become successful in their careers, if they choose the socially acceptable route? And if so, do you think this might …

  24. comment
    Comment #10430317

    Unfortunately I don't have time to go into this more, but I also appreciate the tone of your reply. A very brief summary of my position is that there is a set of "right" laws, and …

  25. comment
    Comment #10423864

    Can someone qualified comment on whether group selection is taken seriously among biologists now? I haven't followed the debate much but Dawkins at least has argued that group sele…