Viewing profile — kreco
kreco
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 26, 2018, 2:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 313
- Public activity
- 162 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kreco
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49019305
What is the point of the comment? I read it as "some forks are successful", and well, you need to fork to be a successful fork.
-
comment
Comment #49011432
Fair. I should have said that the boycott is totally on a different level.
-
comment
Comment #49005261
It happens to be Russian. So people boycott it. You may note that when US goes to war nobody boycott the US.
-
comment
Comment #49004409
> I was kind of thinking of switching to codeberg, but now I am questioning their decisions here. It reads to me that you are afraid of getting your project removed if you ever mov…
-
comment
Comment #48947539
I was expecting a a link to the source code after the "written in C".
-
comment
Comment #48922378
The title made me realized that there is less and less use of the "serverless". Which was one of the most non-sensical word to say "You don't maintain the server".
-
comment
Comment #48909555
I find his comment interesting. It's just mundane feedback, but still a feedback. Likewise, you could ignore his comment but decided to engage.
-
comment
Comment #48907530
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48907279
> "yes it has a reputation for being confusing, but much of it is undeserved" This is not what is written here: > Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be. They j…
-
comment
Comment #48907216
> You've made one and only one point in this thread so far: I'm addressing only that point. You've provided no other elaborations. You're saying "it has a reputation for being conf…
-
comment
Comment #48906526
You are moving the goalposts. I could show you thousands of message backing up the confusion. But you can keep nitpick irrelevant part of messages and pretend you are very smart.
-
comment
Comment #48904970
This is irrelevant to the topic. I didn't ask why git was widely used. I didn't say git was useless. Again, there were version controls before git came out.
-
comment
Comment #48904873
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48904745
You conveniently cherry picked the least relevant part of my message. No one said everything should be easy as pie. There are other software similar to git that have not such reput…
-
comment
Comment #48904593
There is no aggression. If your product has a reputation to confuse users compared to other products, your product confuses users. Let's not start to bend reality just to back up s…
-
comment
Comment #48904426
> Git is not nearly as confusing as people make it out to be. The people are confused, it's a fact. So it is confusing. Stop gaslighting people.
-
comment
Comment #48861317
Yes. But definitely not this year.
-
comment
Comment #48860806
AI is trained on a various range of code quality, including very low one. I'm paid to provide good quality code and not flood my company with more average code than it should. In m…
-
comment
Comment #48819665
> why wouldn't they just sell it? Serious question, is there any kind of entities that can be owned, but not "dismantled", if you don't want it you need to try to sell or make it i…
-
comment
Comment #48818164
This is incredibly helpful. Thank you!
-
comment
Comment #48815202
Sorry for the slight off-topic: Is there any standard protocol/format for "layers" that could be added to such Map apps? Let's say I want to write a plugin to add my own kind of da…
-
comment
Comment #48582516
I know it's just a blog post, but I wish I knew what "level" of mold and roaches we are talking about. Seeing mold in joints is not unusual depending on the conditions, but it's al…
-
comment
Comment #48581638
Maybe because they want contributions. They have probably enough _bigger_ projects that dogfoods it.
-
comment
Comment #48246698
> I don’t think changing from zig to rust suddenly means that don’t know what a certain file contains or how it works or how it relates to other files. What if there was some malic…
-
comment
Comment #48148401
Now I can!