Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — kdv

kdv

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jan 20, 2018, 7:14 PM UTC
HN karma
32
Public activity
25 items

About kdv

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25129540

    If you don't need immediate access to the packet payload, I've been enjoying Brim Desktop [1]. It comes pre-packaged with Zeek (formerly Bro) and gives you a UI to view and query t…

  2. comment
    Comment #19548246

    How is Cloudflare handling IP allocation here? I might be mis-understanding how WireGuard works, but it doesn't look like there is an official method for IP dynamic assignment.

  3. comment
    Comment #17691371

    I truly appreciate Wireguard's simplicity but what's the best way to handle key management and peer address assignment in larger deployments?

  4. comment
    Comment #17241443

    We have the full support of the network admin staff, so punching out is not an issue, we just want to keep it as clean as possible. My guess is our control channel will likely end …

  5. comment
    Comment #17239503

    You sound like you have some experience in this area so I'll ask. I'm working with fielded devices that typically sit on enterprise networks. We operate much like an IoT device, bu…

  6. comment
    Comment #17093854

    I'm certainly comfortable with WireGuard for machine to machine connections, but I don't see how it would replace traditional VPN w/ 2FA (e.g OVPN w/ Duo) for non-technical staff t…

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #17093685

    Edited my question above for clarity. Any info on performance, key management, and managing peer address assignment in larger deployments?

  9. comment
    Comment #17093492

    Is there any info on how many concurrent clients the WireGuard server can handle? I'd be interested in hearing if anyone has used this for management traffic to a large (>100) numb…

  10. comment
    Comment #16875705

    Interesting. I'm curious how they compare to Citus and if there are any tight integrations with their over services (managed Kafka or Elasticsearch)

  11. comment
    Comment #16871608

    We get that, but I left off (for brevity) the reasons why Citus would be a net positive for our use case.

  12. comment
    Comment #16871542

    Does anyone have insight or experience using this in production? We're currently running PostgreSQL 10 w/ pg_partman on our own hardware but looking at a several options for cloud …

  13. comment
    Comment #16871506

    My understanding is people are able to run and manage Citus themselves on GCP (not Cloud SQL), but Citus Cloud (the managed solution) is only available in AWS.

  14. comment
    Comment #16332191

    Interested to hear more about your use case and why you moved from tinc to zt. Are you usually deployed behind a NAT? Do you use ZT's servers?

  15. comment
    Comment #16265997

    I wouldn't use virtualbox in any situation where security is a concern nor Qubes OS unless you know what you're doing. Your best option for minimal effort is to use VMware workstat…

  16. comment
    Comment #16234591

    That's great! Certainly not saying you should abandon those efforts, but see if you can find a security shop that has experienced researchers doing what you want do and sell them o…

  17. comment
    Comment #16227303

    I don't know of any security talent with moderate people skills that has trouble getting a job. However, there does seem to be a huge misunderstanding on how to best break into the…

  18. comment
    Comment #16217691

    That's a reasonable question. You're absolutely correct that security is often highly dependent on account configuration, but Google has invested more into security than any other …

  19. comment
    Comment #16214626

    These days you pretty much have to choose between privacy (e.g Protonmail, Fastmail, self-hosted) and security (Google). Account security should matter more since your primary emai…

  20. comment
    Comment #16204894

    BeyondCorp sounds great in theory, but deployment sounds like a nightmare without going to one of the several companies that are offering it as a service. It's certainly not as acc…

  21. comment
    Comment #16195362

    Erm I think you're thinking of materialized views. Regular views are essentially stored queries. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/rules-materialized...

  22. comment
    Comment #16195336

    A simple example is you bucket your data into monthly tables such that when you run a query that has a timestamp constraint, the query analyzer is smart enough to only scan a subse…

  23. comment
    Comment #16195323

    Traditional views are just stored queries that are built on the fly, so there's no performance improvement. Materialized views are stored/cached on disk and will give you some perf…

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #16194922

    Is anyone that was using pg_partman before migrated to native partitioning yet? No support for ON CONFLICT and PKs are serious limitations that are available with pg_partman.