Viewing profile — kadoban
kadoban
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 3:28 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 7,244
- Public activity
- 3,084 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kadoban
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49218202
It's a lot smaller, and runs (quantized) on a 3090 quite well. Ds4 flash 0731 you're talking about? It's great but it's much harder to run locally.
-
comment
Comment #49218031
Yeah I think it got bad press because the chat templates (or something?) were messed up on first release, but I've been using a quant of it and it's a powerhouse, better than qwen …
-
comment
Comment #49192450
Is there? Like...kind of, but on the face of it I'd say about the same amount in both. If you look back at DES there's a _lot_ in common with modern ciphers, but like, RSA is still…
-
comment
Comment #49192349
> with a key that repeats There's a _lot_ hiding in that, all of the interesting stuff for security and potential breaks. So...yeah it is based on complicated math, it's just in th…
-
comment
Comment #49184787
> What practical things are possible or might be possible due to these results? Not much, they're all fairly minor problems that have been solved, of ~entirely niche academic inter…
-
comment
Comment #49178210
You can just fire it up and ask it to suggest some, or look on the site at the most downloaded and see which sound useful to you. That's basically what I did. I also put in some wo…
-
comment
Comment #49178198
It's really just the minimal prompt and the minimal built-in skills. And ~full control I guess if you wire up something custom (I haven't).
-
comment
Comment #49128969
Human psychology might allow other reasonable criteria even if perfectly rational choice is just total time to destination.
-
comment
Comment #49101011
The friction exists vastly unevenly. Some people are so scared of needles that they couldn't possibly get a tattoo recreationally, some people don't give af and get them with no th…
-
comment
Comment #49044851
China can get what they want, a weakened USA, just by sitting back and doing nothing. There's probably no incentive to get involved more directly.
-
comment
Comment #49043817
There's probably some system prompt crap in claude code that tamps down that behavior? I wonder what it was even trying to do.
-
comment
Comment #49011271
It's not like this is a new problem. Turing had a definition most of a century ago, he wasn't the first and certainly wasn't the last. I don't think we need new terms necessarily, …
-
comment
Comment #48971878
Different quants, but I've been having success with: https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3.6 I do llama.cpp
-
comment
Comment #48964718
It's an open question in mathematics/CS, that's all we know. If you want to know more, get to mathing :)
-
comment
Comment #48955110
They make little ~rubber caps to cover the charging port when you're not using it. That, and make sure it's dry when you charge it to rule out galvanic nonsense.
-
comment
Comment #48943096
Once you start getting shooty up in space, I think you fairly quickly get into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome cascades of collisions and debris anyway, so it probab…
-
comment
Comment #48904507
Coders like to code. It's in our nature. Even those who will get no benefit from it still _very_ often code their own version of things for various reasons, often bad reasons.
-
comment
Comment #48904490
Figuring out how to prompt and test is educational, and it's potentially a useful test of a model/harness.
-
comment
Comment #48887648
You're being sarcastic but you're not far wrong. Scent is a big part of attraction and sex. It's somewhat subtle, but important. Artifically capturing that sounds...doomed though.
-
comment
Comment #48884535
I think there's some setting to restrict the number of them, or maybe turn them off. Doesn't happen for me ~ever and it's not my $$ (work) so I haven't really looked at it much.
-
comment
Comment #48874744
Not every possible thing has real situations where it's better. There are legitimately terrible solutions to problems, that are dominated by better ones in every situation. Like th…
-
comment
Comment #48874424
It's possible, it would just be _very_ dumb. It'd also turn into just...shooting them all down, restrictions of who anything is over wouldn't survive.
-
comment
Comment #48874084
It could only ever increase by the surface area of the satellite lens things. It'll be a rounding error compared to the surface area of Earth (or compared to the effect of greenhou…
-
comment
Comment #48874076
Is it ever, ever going to be cheaper or easier or more effective than just launching a missile? Seems...unlikely just on the face of it.
-
comment
Comment #48874051
That would be fairly nonsense. There's _very_ few orbits that can stick over a particular place, and it's only places on the equator. We'd be giving up 99+% of useful orbits.