Viewing profile — k1m
k1m
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 14, 2010, 2:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,890
- Public activity
- 573 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About k1m
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #48769142
I personally have no insight into what they have or haven't dismantled. Just found the article interesting (had never heard of the company). Was responding to the "They seized the …
-
comment
Comment #48768827
NearlyFreeSpeech.NET: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/about/
-
comment
Comment #48768737
Google shows netnut.com[1] being the same thing, so not sure it's the wrong domain. Maybe not the main one. Brian Krebs' comment on this[2]: > Pretty sure they're working on gettin…
- story
-
comment
Comment #48761625
This article, as with many like it, ignores the fact that trust in "traditional media" is at an all time low globally. That's not because people enjoy fake news on social media, it…
-
comment
Comment #48525178
> I think many people in tech have existed in a high-demand labor market for so long that they have no idea how much less other job markets reward people for their intelligence, wo…
-
comment
Comment #48525060
> The fundamental flaw in all these style arguments against core employment is people's personal desire to have a straight forward path for survival that doesn't involve a lot of s…
-
comment
Comment #48525025
I'm not in the camp that believes AI is actually going to reach human intelligence. So yes, AI is simply dumb. But many people overlook the fact that many of our jobs today require…
-
comment
Comment #48524986
My post focused more on trying to question why we value jobs so much, beyond the paychecks they offer. I didn't get into alternatives, but Universal Basic Income (UBI) is what you'…
-
comment
Comment #48524917
On your first point, I agree with you that it's a deeply held belief. But that doesn't make it reasonable. That's why I think it's worth the effort trying to question it, especiall…
-
comment
Comment #48517573
> There is no future in which they willingly submit to the kind of redistribution that would be required to finance a society where work is optional. Do they ever willingly submit …
-
comment
Comment #48517481
> because jobs are fucking important and necessary Why are they important and necessary, and for whom?
-
comment
Comment #48517394
I agree, but I think it's a shame that this purpose to life is tied to jobs. It's understandable, because pretty much everyone's path in life is schooling, then a job. So the job b…
-
comment
Comment #48517346
Believe it or not, many people genuinely don't see an alternative to having a job. So when AI threatens jobs, rather than call for measures to ensure people can live without jobs, …
-
comment
Comment #48517314
> Without an incentive (i.e., paycheck) for people to work (e.g., code, write articles, answer forum questions, etc.) Many people do all those things in their spare time, unpaid, b…
-
comment
Comment #48517254
I understand that, and that's what I was trying to get at with the post. That an AI future which can take away jobs, doesn't have to be a bad one if the paycheck is replaced with s…
- story
-
comment
Comment #48402036
Definition of conflict of interest: a conflict between the private interests and the official responsibilities of a person in a position of trust. Army generals are in a position o…
-
comment
Comment #48399512
As the person suggesting that the Guardian is somehow an exception in the UK media, I think the onus should be on you to prove it. I merely pointed out that the report did not say …
-
comment
Comment #48398276
> Unless there is a clear conflict of interest, such as an "expert" urging a particular course of action That's exactly the issue
-
comment
Comment #48397753
I'm sorry, that's a real stretch. It's apparent to anyone reading what his comment implies. And this is far from an isolated case, if you think the Guardian is an exception. We're …
-
comment
Comment #48396979
The report doesn't say the media mentioned is an exhaustive list of the media that failed to disclose ties to the arms industry, which is what you're assuming. You mention the Guar…
-
comment
Comment #48354876
I think this is the main problem many are overlooking. Much of the fear for website owners that's leading them to block all automated access is simply that their business model rel…
-
comment
Comment #48353325
I was using llms.txt as the general idea of providing an alternative version of your content for agents - whether that's llms.txt for the entire site, my-article.md instead of my-a…