Thoughts on AI and Jobs
blog.keyvan.net
Thoughts on AI and Jobs
1–10 of 58 posts
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#2Sounds like someone who is gainfully employed. Try the alternative for a while and let us know how it goes.
Reality has a persistent ability to clarify your thinking.
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#3Suspicious.
The more immediately unique thing about AI as far as employment is that through all previous innovations, the substrate of adaptation in our economy has still been the human brain. That problem-solving capacity gets encoded into different industries, processes, and products, but fundamentally the thing that keeps humans relevant is that their brains are the things doing the problem-solving, and they get to capture varying amounts of value for playing that role.
AI, at the limit, probably eliminates this role. AFAICT there's no reason that AI cannot itself become the "substrate of adaptation," and completely remove humans from the adaptation-machine that is a modern economy, at which point they (humans) will have no valid claim to that value creation.
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#4Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#5I find using minimal-capability local models or cheap commercial models like deepseek v4 flash to be the most satisfying because I am a major partner in solving problems or simply trying to better understand the world. I do like access to very strong models a few times a week.
A friend’s son and a young tech friend in town have very different views than I do because they are struggling in a tough job market and want a competitive advantage. I am grateful that I am not in that position.
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#6Not sure it will feed my kids, put a roof over my head and look after me as I age and my body fails me though.
As mentioned below, it’s easy to feel safe and secure when one has the means, independent of their livelihood.
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#7The mistake people make is thinking AI is going to lay waste to almost all employment.
It may change many jobs and eliminate some but see above. If you live in a (functioning) democracy the notion is politically improbable. That's not to say there are not people who will vote against their own interests, again and again, even after being screwed each time. The point is that being politically aware, savvy and organized is an important part of surviving. This was always the case, but recent events make this starkly obvious.
On top of that AI projections are currently a form of mass hysteria or greedy fantasy, depending on if you see yourself as labor or capital. Both utterly unhinged from reality.
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#8Like every single productivity improvement before it, the bulk of the gains of AI will be piled into land rents, which then gets diffused into the cost of everything that happens upon land (which is everything). Then we'll just remark "wow, we still need to keep working because the cost of living has really gone up!" and somehow not realize that the only thing in our economy where its inputs have not increased in pri…
I wish we had a modern version of him with more popularity than Andrew yang
Re: Thoughts on AI and Jobs
#9If a job or task can be automated, it should be automated. That process increases productivity which is good for the economy and society. The mistake people make is thinking AI is going to lay waste to almost all employment. It may change many jobs and eliminate some but see above. If you live in a (functioning) democracy the notion is politically improbable. That's not to say there are not people who will vote again…
I am by no means an AI doomer, and I use frontier models to a great extent every day as part of my job…
But those at the top of the corporate food chain, those who own and profit from the AI companies themselves, will reap the rewards of this technology.
Maybe there won’t be a dramatic elimination of jobs. But even if there isn’t, the overwhelming majority of the “value” will be going to the 1% and the working class will benefit not.
Heads they win, tails we lose.
AI will not meaningfully improve the standard of living or the quality of life of the everyman. But it will funnel even more of his share of the profit from his work to his corporate paymasters.
Previously we had strikes, powerful unions and even revolutions. There will be none of that this time round.