Viewing profile — justDankin
justDankin
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 4:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 263
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About justDankin
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #24653725
I work as a researcher at the The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), where we've been actively studying internet censorship in India over the last year. We've built CensorWatch…
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #24635639
We released a subset of the data along with the paper (~5K hostnames), can be accessed at https://github.com/kush789/How-India-Censors-The-Web-Data The app uses a more updated list…
-
comment
Comment #24635581
Unfortunately we don't have the expertise or bandwidth to make that :/
-
comment
Comment #24635191
I'm one of the authors of the paper in the post, we're trying to extend this work by crowdsourcing censorship measurements from different vantage points in India. We've compiled th…
-
comment
Comment #24628334
Ah yes, my bad. I meant to say ESNI Read https://gfw.report/blog/gfw_esni_blocking/en/ some time back, recalled it incorrectly
-
comment
Comment #24628030
You never know. Could be a mistake where they were trying to block a certain path due to some search result of copyright infringement, but ended up banning the domain itself. One c…
-
comment
Comment #24627923
Well, they could block TLS1.3 entirely (which would force hosts to drop down to 1.2 for connections) GFC does this, I really hope it doesn't happen here
-
comment
Comment #24627884
Haha yeah, I've been procrastinating for the last 5 years now
-
comment
Comment #24627454
Yes! That's a great observation However, the reason I went for probing the entire path is because the TTL itself can be spoofed
- comment
-
comment
Comment #24627264
Yeah there was a huge outcry about it on Twitter some time back. P.S. From the screenshot, it looks like you're trying to connect to [http]://duck.., hence shifting to https works.…
-
comment
Comment #24626990
Yes, that was the case
-
comment
Comment #24626924
I haven't been able to test that yet, neither am aware of any research which answers that question. IMO the only way to do that would be to either (i) block the IP (high collateral…
-
comment
Comment #24626690
Using the TTL, we figured out that the censor kicks in at the kth hop. This kth box belonged to Airtel. If a box was censoring after Airtel, we would have received a clean response…
- story
-
comment
Comment #24615509
Thanks for running it! We are in the data collection stage at this moment, will definitely be publishing our findings and releasing the data publicly. P.S. Our previous paper talks…
-
comment
Comment #24614440
I'm new to HN(3 months, low karma). Maybe that's the reason? Not sure what would be the correct way to "fix" this Thanks for vouching!
-
comment
Comment #24614315
You can delete it after running. Each run on an (ISP, state) combination gives a new test point. Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #24613963
DoH just by itself won't help unfortunately, since it just fetches the DNS (btw, only Airtel, ACT, BSNL, and MTNL bother with DNS censorship). ISPs have been looking at the clearte…