Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jonaharagon

jonaharagon

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 8:38 PM UTC
HN karma
81
Public activity
30 items

About jonaharagon

https://mastodon.neat.computer/@jonah

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47847476

    Reading the actual text of the bill, it seems like a first-boot date of birth prompt and everything else you’ve described is exactly what the bill is asking for actually.

  2. story
  3. comment
  4. story
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #45174967

    True, and this is also the case in many other countries. Even if it is revocable by future legislation though, having pro-privacy laws on the books to prevent the current executive…

  7. comment
    Comment #45174918

    I mean that'd certainly be nice, and it is also their only job, but even if they wanted to do it in regular legislation that'd be better than nothing. Make a law that says companie…

  8. comment
    Comment #45174769

    Realistically the EU only cares about protecting their citizens from private companies, and especially American ones. When it comes to government overreach they know virtually no b…

  9. comment
    Comment #45174726

    I shared your comment with the author and we're going to reorder some of the sentences in a little bit to highlight the fact it's a backdoor earlier. We've talked about Chat Contro…

  10. comment
    Comment #45174685

    > They start outlawing encryption altogether? This is the direction places like the UK have gone in, yes. Can't decrypt something? Then we assume it is illegal content.

  11. comment
    Comment #45174672

    > Do they think they're above it? Yes, the lawmakers literally exempt themselves from this law in this law.

  12. comment
    Comment #45174649

    Totally. This is exactly the problem with things like Chat Control in the EU and KOSA in the US. They will just introduce the same bill over and over and over again until they get …

  13. comment
    Comment #44678935

    You can disable purchase sharing and still do subscription sharing, which completely solves this problem.

  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #43306019

    This post is 3 years old and mostly talking about a completely different website, because the poster didn’t know privacyguides.org moved to a new domain after the old one was hijac…

  16. comment
    Comment #43086093

    We cover that too [0]. In addition, while I wouldn't blanket recommend a VPN usually, it's important to use a VPN in conjunction with Mullvad Browser (specifically). If you're not …

  17. comment
    Comment #43086004

    Most are, most are affiliate link-farms in disguise as well, and privacyguides.org is written in response to such guides. It is called privacy guides and not security guides for a …

  18. comment
    Comment #43085024

    We don't have a deal with Brave. It was added almost 3 years ago, and nobody has even proposed removing it in the time since. Furthermore, it would be insane and likely illegal for…

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #40726471

    > The Apple system was pretty much the best way this could be done This may be true, and yet it's also true that it was still a terrible plan. This is exactly why it simply shouldn…

  21. comment
    Comment #40704423

    I've always worried that Proton might succumb to the enshittification that seems to eventually plague all tech companies. This news makes me a lot more optimistic that won't be the…

  22. comment
    Comment #39563587

    Yeah, that is interesting to me. I would imagine one of the main reasons people have been asking for alternative browser engine support in the first place is the potential to have …

  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #35811263

    I didn’t realize hitting the “join” button on a new subreddit was an insurmountable obstacle for some.

  25. comment
    Comment #35811138

    > How am I supposed to contribute to a NoDerivatives project? I don’t understand this question, like literally how? The process has not changed. The FSF recommends CC BY-ND for wor…