Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — joencott

joencott

HN member
Joined
Sat, Nov 26, 2022, 3:56 AM UTC
HN karma
68
Public activity
23 items

About joencott

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #35238168

    > (i.e. the momentum you allude to[1]) The momentum stalled when the community was plagued recently by toxic behaviour of one of the members who started the fork. He had to step do…

  2. comment
    Comment #35234600

    Not enough people are talking about this, as soon as the company took over they started to remove functionality. Shame on them.

  3. comment
    Comment #35234501

    It is sad to see that the forgejo team accept and promote the built-in CI server. When the PR was first made they said they shouldn't trust the code, and will stick with woodpecker…

  4. comment
    Comment #35234476

    Forgejo did relicense, there was a democratic vote and the it was agreed to finally relicense to a license that respects user's freedoms

  5. comment
    Comment #35234446

    Forgejo is AGPL, there was just a vote and the community came out strongly to say they disagree with commercial usage of Forgejo! I am so happy they did that!

  6. story
  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #33750578

    > developers working in any software to make a god damn living and not die starving in a gutter There are many examples of opensource developers receiving full time payment from th…

  9. comment
    Comment #33750529

    > Why should anyone care/use CI/CD software because Codeberg uses it? Woodpecker is community-run, and Codeberg is a non-profit running the biggest Gitea instance. > You speak nega…

  10. comment
    Comment #33750479

    I am a fan of this fork, but not participating. SourceHut is relevant because the link is a reaction to what ddevault did for changing the SourceHut terms of service https://source…

  11. comment
    Comment #33750466

    What does it sound like in your language?

  12. comment
    Comment #33750457

    It was done by a democratic vote https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/1#issuecomment-6885...

  13. comment
    Comment #33750448

    A platform needs to be moderated, and I support Codeberg. Ddevault and SourceHut already banned all cryptocurrency-related projects.

  14. comment
    Comment #33750422

    Forgejo is owned by an independent community instead of a for-profit company, and promises to be free/libre forever!

  15. comment
    Comment #33750409

    It is easy to use, and Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD

  16. comment
    Comment #33750333

    This should not be trusted, the for-profit company worked on in secret on this for months with multiple people, and released it today in a code dump with no input from the communit…

  17. comment
    Comment #33750320

    You should try it, Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD

  18. comment
    Comment #33750307

    If only everyone follows ddevault's advice and starts each project with AGPL, that way no company can steal the code.

  19. comment
    Comment #33750272

    Forgejo is a community-run fork because the project should not be owned by a for-profit company.

  20. comment
    Comment #33750218

    The open letter gives all the details you need to know https://gitea-open-letter.coding.social/

  21. comment
    Comment #33750209

    It's easy \ˈfor.d͡ʒe.jo\ the Esperanto word for forge

  22. comment
    Comment #33750191

    Today the for-profit company released a code dump for the implementation of an integrated CI/CD server. This was worked on in secret for months by multiple people with no say from …

  23. story