Viewing profile — joencott
joencott
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 26, 2022, 3:56 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 68
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About joencott
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35238168
> (i.e. the momentum you allude to[1]) The momentum stalled when the community was plagued recently by toxic behaviour of one of the members who started the fork. He had to step do…
-
comment
Comment #35234600
Not enough people are talking about this, as soon as the company took over they started to remove functionality. Shame on them.
-
comment
Comment #35234501
It is sad to see that the forgejo team accept and promote the built-in CI server. When the PR was first made they said they shouldn't trust the code, and will stick with woodpecker…
-
comment
Comment #35234476
Forgejo did relicense, there was a democratic vote and the it was agreed to finally relicense to a license that respects user's freedoms
-
comment
Comment #35234446
Forgejo is AGPL, there was just a vote and the community came out strongly to say they disagree with commercial usage of Forgejo! I am so happy they did that!
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #33750578
> developers working in any software to make a god damn living and not die starving in a gutter There are many examples of opensource developers receiving full time payment from th…
-
comment
Comment #33750529
> Why should anyone care/use CI/CD software because Codeberg uses it? Woodpecker is community-run, and Codeberg is a non-profit running the biggest Gitea instance. > You speak nega…
-
comment
Comment #33750479
I am a fan of this fork, but not participating. SourceHut is relevant because the link is a reaction to what ddevault did for changing the SourceHut terms of service https://source…
-
comment
Comment #33750466
What does it sound like in your language?
-
comment
Comment #33750457
It was done by a democratic vote https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/1#issuecomment-6885...
-
comment
Comment #33750448
A platform needs to be moderated, and I support Codeberg. Ddevault and SourceHut already banned all cryptocurrency-related projects.
-
comment
Comment #33750422
Forgejo is owned by an independent community instead of a for-profit company, and promises to be free/libre forever!
-
comment
Comment #33750409
It is easy to use, and Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD
-
comment
Comment #33750333
This should not be trusted, the for-profit company worked on in secret on this for months with multiple people, and released it today in a code dump with no input from the communit…
-
comment
Comment #33750320
You should try it, Codeberg uses it for their public CI/CD
-
comment
Comment #33750307
If only everyone follows ddevault's advice and starts each project with AGPL, that way no company can steal the code.
-
comment
Comment #33750272
Forgejo is a community-run fork because the project should not be owned by a for-profit company.
-
comment
Comment #33750218
The open letter gives all the details you need to know https://gitea-open-letter.coding.social/
-
comment
Comment #33750209
It's easy \ˈfor.d͡ʒe.jo\ the Esperanto word for forge
-
comment
Comment #33750191
Today the for-profit company released a code dump for the implementation of an integrated CI/CD server. This was worked on in secret for months by multiple people with no say from …
- story