Viewing profile — jashmota
jashmota
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 09, 2019, 12:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 96
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jashmota
email: contact at useflywheel dot ai
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45381020
These are really really interesting thoughts around the remote teleop interface. A few things you mentioned have been on my mind. Teleop UX is underdeveloped and its affects is und…
-
comment
Comment #45380942
I completely agree. If you have worked in the industry, I would like to talk to you and get your feedback on what I might be missing on my understanding in requirements in safety l…
-
comment
Comment #45380922
This is a great idea - I would dig into this. I disagree on AI not winning here. Support crew mostly work on eliminating blindspots for operator. Yes you can eliminate blindspots w…
-
comment
Comment #45380891
I totally agree, what I meant was if we only do CANbus retrofit, we would really limit ourselves in how compatible we are. So we have to focus on doing the right kind of retrofit r…
-
comment
Comment #45380862
You've touched one of my favorite things to think about. I think about this a lot. There will always be people who enjoy fully analog cars/planes/watches over alternatives. I think…
-
comment
Comment #45380786
I agree - the dumping and digging itself (where you move boom, arm, bucket much more than swing/tracks) should be manual. But swinging to the truck and back to pit (pure swinging m…
-
comment
Comment #45376432
1. We're OEM/machine-agnostic 2. Full compatibility with any existing model and not just specific recent models
-
comment
Comment #45369362
I think swinging (which is about 40% of dig and dump workflow by time spent) should not be manual. That's lowest levels of autonomy which requires roughly centering to the pit/truc…
-
comment
Comment #45369042
I'd like to add that this was done in partnership with Frodobots.ai ( https://frodobots.ai ) and BitRobot.ai ( https://bitrobot.ai ). They are working on a great mission statement …
-
comment
Comment #45368948
I definitely agree with you - recreating the scene in teleop is challenging. In excavators, however, it does make it better. An excavator has huge blindspots on the right (due to a…
-
comment
Comment #45368811
I can relate to how you felt. Even though I developed this myself, when I saw it running remotely with no one sitting inside for the first time, it felt magical and weird. This is …
-
comment
Comment #45368579
The way I think about this - we should not have multi screens. Human field of vision is 60 degrees for central and about 120 degrees binocular. The bucket of the excavator is way n…
-
comment
Comment #45368527
I would love to explore that - could you help make this happen (I'm guessing you know him)?
-
comment
Comment #45368514
Mining has had autonomous haulage (and to some extent excavation) for some years. They have been very tightly coupled to the individual machines, models and the quarry site. Constr…
-
comment
Comment #45368488
Haha yes - luckily we don't get this outside SF. We call it flywheel because our mission is to solve data flywheel problem in robotics. related, this cool photo: https://x.com/jash…
-
comment
Comment #45366765
I might be less experienced than you - I've operated upto 38 tons on maximum 15 degrees incline. I wasn't moving tracks a lot when I did that. Would like to hear what scenarios you…
-
comment
Comment #45366682
Interestingly, we had some people try out VR teleop: https://x.com/Scobleizer/status/1970245161306464667 https://x.com/jash_mota/status/1969091992140304703 I think force feedback i…
-
comment
Comment #45366607
That's indeed what we're trying to test to the extreme - to see how far we could go with just vision. We haven't done heavy excavation workflows yet, but we have some early success…
-
comment
Comment #45366444
Thanks! Yes we're testing both CAN spoofing and retrofits. CAN spoofing really limits compatibility to a few machines/brands. Would love to get in touch with you: my email is conta…
-
comment
Comment #45366310
We're indeed streaming the audio and have haptic feedback. My hypothesis is the seat vibration isn't as helpful. It's sub optimal and operators would be far more productive without…
-
comment
Comment #45366303
You're right! This is exactly why we like to do mechanical actuation - we are able to achieve bilateral telepresence, which essentially gives the torque (haptic) feedback over the …
-
comment
Comment #45366273
Thanks! Let's chat: contact @ useflywheel dot ai
-
comment
Comment #45366264
It's far cheaper than millions! We're making something equipment owners want :) Let's chat? My email is contact at useflywheel dot ai
-
comment
Comment #45365900
You're spot on! The experienced operators are quite skilled at moving these machines. The number of operators who could do this work are decreasing and it's also pretty dangerous w…
-
comment
Comment #45365845
We have some autonomous safety layers (comprised of object/human detection like you mentioned and others) even for remote teleop. But we haven't deployed autonomy on real sites yet…