Viewing profile — jadar
jadar
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 6:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 393
- Public activity
- 113 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jadar
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49217532
You're right. But I used it specifically because of the open letter calling for open models — or at least for not banning them — which went around recently and represented a very l…
-
comment
Comment #49214291
Isn't this the opposite of what everyone is saying should happen? That is, lead with open models -- or at least "openness" and don't leave the capabilities in the hands of an elite…
-
comment
Comment #49202086
That's some form of success.
-
comment
Comment #49201729
I stopped at "f*ck*ss". Irreverent drivel is unserious and a waste of time.
-
comment
Comment #49109434
A compiler is not an LLM, and I do not want to equivocate, but there are aspects of similarity. We do not assume people read the bytes of machine code to ensure it’s correct — ther…
-
comment
Comment #49076605
Do you have some browser extension that replaces phrases with that? That quote doesn't exist in the piece.
-
comment
Comment #49076406
This reads almost dishonestly. > Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weights models. This is not an unqualified never. The very next sentence makes a qualified statemen…
-
comment
Comment #49074143
Self-hosting a language used to be standard practice. These days that's become a bit more controversial, but I definitely wouldn't lump that in as a sign of obsession.
-
comment
Comment #49074101
This doesn't answer the question it asks.
-
comment
Comment #49057641
I know everything is told from a perspective, but I find the Marxist “aristocrat / bourgeois” lens rather tired and severely anachronistic. This is told as if Luther and the Magist…
-
comment
Comment #49035614
Completely agree. That doesn't change the fact that people are fickle and want to have their cake even as they're eating it.
-
comment
Comment #49035583
Lol imagine if he had changed his profile pic just for this. I don't think that would make him look any better.
-
comment
Comment #49035554
I tend to agree. But the devil's advocate in me says that then they'd be accused of not having empathy. That sort of thing might work in Europe — but for a US company, I think you …
-
comment
Comment #49027361
> It’s just not stuff LLMs are good at. But then you're back at the question from the OP of "why not?" Is it lack of good examples in the training data? Is there something of code …
-
comment
Comment #49027070
Isn't that how AI written software gets better too? By steering the model towards the goals of the user? I don't know if it's a question of how many features to feed to the model, …
-
comment
Comment #49026142
> So, why can't models do software maintainability? I feel like the explanation does nothing to actually elucidate why models can't do it. Is it an inherent weakness of LLMs? Train…
-
comment
Comment #49016042
I mean that's how I personally would define ethical. But anytime someone makes a claim like that, you have to ask "by what standard." And it's usually just "me."
-
comment
Comment #48910455
Cause it was written by AI?
-
comment
Comment #48697784
Isn’t that somewhat similar to everywhere else AI is being employed? More of the same — just faster? We aren’t getting novel software architecture out of AI, those things are still…
-
comment
Comment #48685872
Plot twist, they both vibe coded it and now are pointing the finger at each other. /s
-
comment
Comment #48678105
Just to be clear, this doesn't mean that anything on the die actually measures 0.7nm — it means that it's roughly double the density as the previous node generation. At some point …
-
comment
Comment #48668047
Perhaps an arrangement can be reached?
-
comment
Comment #48668008
If resold Anthropic tokens undercut even the at-cost open-weight model tokens, because they're reselling subsidized subscription tokens, then you'd have to start selling open-weigh…
-
comment
Comment #48666148
Okay, nevermind, I was able to view it on mobile.
-
comment
Comment #48660112
Okay, random dude says something -- everything completely behind paywall. Guess it wasn't important.