Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ironrabbit

ironrabbit

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 10, 2013, 5:42 PM UTC
HN karma
364
Public activity
48 items

About ironrabbit

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #41569199

    Which part of SB1047 do you think is too onerous or not "slow regulation" enough?

  2. comment
    Comment #38381101

    This is a forum post from a student with 18 total karma

  3. comment
    Comment #38369088

    Zero chance private github repos make it into openai training data, can you imagine the shitshow if GPT-4 started regurgitating your org's internal codebase?

  4. comment
    Comment #37424280

    Automatic kernel fusion (compilation) is a very active field, and most major frameworks support some easy-to-use compilation (e.g. jax's jit, or torch.compile which iirc uses opena…

  5. comment
    Comment #36461254

    The median OAI employee with a 900k comp is probably L5, not L6 or L7

  6. comment
    Comment #36461231

    New hires' comp is much higher than existing employees', especially if you've hit your cliff. 7 figures for E6 can happen if you joined recently, have good counter-offers, and nego…

  7. comment
    Comment #36460751

    All engineers and researchers, even junior, are "Member of Technical Staff" at OAI

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #36431568

    > the company pushed back against a proposed amendment to the AI Act that would have classified generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Dall-E as “high risk” if they generated te…

  10. comment
    Comment #35010577

    Character has their own models, and anecdotally I've heard they have one of the better LM training codebases out there.

  11. comment
    Comment #34455029

    Openai is probably the highest status employer among my network, but I don't know any university students

  12. comment
    Comment #34422475

    Andrej's "Building Makemore" series is exactly this, it includes a wonderful lecture where he computes all the gradients for a simple network by hand and compares them against the …

  13. comment
    Comment #34349528

    minGPT prioritized being understandable above all else, and was not very fast. This repo includes several optimizations, but it still much more understandable than probably any oth…

  14. comment
    Comment #34072355

    Anecdotally, chatgpt seems much worse to me than Google for getting correct answers. Like orders of magnitude worse. Tells me the wrong timezone for a city kind of bad. No doubt it…

  15. comment
    Comment #34072298

    This looks very nice but no android support is unfortunately a dealbreaker

  16. comment
    Comment #33624613

    Signal boosting in case anyone from notion is reading: please address performance, it is practically the only thing I care about. I love the product but it is almost unusably slow …

  17. comment
    Comment #33228403

    The "scandal" that prompted this article is referenced with sources under the heading "Why XCheck is in the news". Neither the article nor the comment you're replying to says anyth…

  18. comment
    Comment #32015738

    It's a position paper, academics publish them all the time, they're very much a part of scientific discourse. Just different than an experimental results paper.

  19. comment
    Comment #31920701

    are there any continuous calendars like the linked one that allow sync or import from google cal?

  20. comment
    Comment #31159309

    The author is a skilled research scientist in a very competitive space with some high-profile publications (e.g. Gumbel Softmax). He is absolutely an outlier, but not a unicorn -- …

  21. comment
    Comment #30982405

    Curious, are there benefits of greenway connections compared to allocating the same amount of green space elsewhere?

  22. comment
    Comment #30834180

    Is there any evidence that GPT-3 responses are edited/filtered before being returned to users? My understanding is that some GPT-3 responses are annotated post-hoc, and this data i…

  23. comment
    Comment #30171231

    As of a few years ago, lidar added at least $7500 to the cost of a car. That's a huge price difference for a consumer.

  24. comment
    Comment #29988669

    Not even mentioning Pluribus is just bad journalism

  25. comment
    Comment #29937495

    As someone who has had to reproduce others' research results: it is much much better to release the unclean, unorganized code that actually produced your results than it is to rele…