Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hylianwarrior

hylianwarrior

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 02, 2017, 9:08 AM UTC
HN karma
145
Public activity
38 items

About hylianwarrior

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44826931

    "From 2007 to 2016 Funch carried out his project 42nd and Vanderbilt in which he captures the same person twice, mid-commute, leaving the viewer to wonder if they were photographed…

  2. comment
    Comment #19804405

    They actually just recently released a sequel to Human Resource Machine called "7 Billion Humans". Builds on the gameplay but adds parallelism

  3. comment
    Comment #19610782

    > I honestly can't understand why Google hasn't been able to replicate the success of iMessage It's not because Google is doing a bad job, it's because Apple is doing a _great_ job…

  4. comment
    Comment #19610767

    There is absolutely a market impact

  5. comment
    Comment #19307525

    None of this analysis accounts for leveling. If women are disproportionately hired at lower levels, pay equity will still be _very_ off, even if the data says otherwise on the surf…

  6. comment
    Comment #19298648

    Literally the second sentence: "Its members locate flaws in software, privately report them to the manufacturers, and give them 90 days to resolve the problem before publicly discl…

  7. comment
    Comment #19242172

    I use PIA. No problems so far.

  8. comment
    Comment #19237298

    It's not _just_ JS though...

  9. comment
    Comment #19237296

    Yep, ARM is affected. See this: https://developer.arm.com/support/arm-security-updates/specu...

  10. comment
    Comment #19237293

    > My naive reading of this is that Google is saying we need to rethink processors themselves if we want to fix this (and we really do want to fix it). Am I reading it correctly? Th…

  11. comment
    Comment #19102744

    Literally, yes.

  12. comment
    Comment #19102743

    No, but you shouldn't even be able to become a billionaire in the first place. That capital should be reinvested into society, not held by an individual.

  13. comment
    Comment #18872027

    > because most companies don't care about ARM in the server space at all It's starting. Cloudflare just announced this, and AWS is adding ARM-based server options. https://blog.clo…

  14. comment
    Comment #18585493

    IIRC this is pretty much the mission of glitch.com - democratizing web presence and giving the power to create back to regular people.

  15. comment
    Comment #18585472

    This makes it no less impressive, IMO

  16. comment
    Comment #18530663

    I like to imagine that someday, somehow this HN thread will be referenced in an article somewhere. The irony would be satisfying.

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #18379269

    Sure, but that's not the point. What the piece actually presents is a (quite interesting) illustration of how the far-right online community kicked off a specific talking point and…

  19. comment
    Comment #18377629

    Seems pretty clear to me: "When I’m out looking for food, and I come across a restaurant where the patrons are laughing and smiling and appear very sociable, I become wary. Don’t g…

  20. comment
    Comment #18377619

    To be fair, this is pretty clearly an opinion piece filled with anecdotes. I'm not sure how much the data would help.

  21. comment
    Comment #18334226

    FYI: After you set up a profile it lets you customize your footer with arbitrary HTML/CSS/JS. It's definitely not secure. See: http://xss.micro.blog

  22. comment
    Comment #18297524

    Yeah, I think more than anything this highlights the extent that media outlets seized on and amplified the outrage.

  23. comment
    Comment #18090242

    Nano as well.

  24. comment
    Comment #18072704

    Why on earth would you think Google would sell its most valuable asset? Google does not sell user data, it builds on it. The more data they get, the better and better their AI will…

  25. comment
    Comment #17019008

    +1, this is the _only_ correct answer to the crypto- UX dilemma.