Viewing profile — hannesw
hannesw
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 23, 2010, 12:26 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 151
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About hannesw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #2908690
This is exactly where I want to go with RingoJS: Many threads with private mutable scope, global read-only scope, worker/actor based thread interop, one event loop per thread. Curr…
-
comment
Comment #2652165
I think the opinions expressed in this article are valid. However, I don't think the inability of current JavaScript to do async I/O without callbacks is Node's biggest problem. As…
-
comment
Comment #2551931
The only way to make it expand forever would be to support recursion. Would be interesting what texts you could come up with that. Kind of a textual Mandelbrot set.
-
comment
Comment #1988967
Another important one is this: FOU: field-of-use restrictions (in the TCK license). http://skife.org/java/jcp/2010/12/07/the-tck-trap.html http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5111
-
comment
Comment #1742714
Updated!
-
comment
Comment #1740691
I just found out the same. So I guess it must be some intra-VM data shifting? Anyway, I'll update my posting accordingly.
-
comment
Comment #1740440
Yes, --trace-gc shows about 10 Mark-sweeps per second, each taking around 13 ms (no compacts though as far as I could see). But are those ~15% spent in GC are enough to explain the…
-
comment
Comment #1740323
You are right about the title. That "not ready for the server" is a foolish phrase. I'd change it to "not tuned for the server" if I could, but it looks like it's impossible to cha…
-
comment
Comment #1740008
Just an educated guess. If you're allocating tons of objects and strings and your app gets slow, it's very likely to be the GC. But I don't know V8 well enough to say for sure.
-
comment
Comment #1739959
Most of these questions are answered in my original, longer post: http://hns.github.com/2010/09/21/benchmark.html . The JSON I'm parsing is just objects with short string propertie…
-
comment
Comment #1739915
I'm the author of both the original article and this HN posting - and yes, I am biased, since I'm the main developer of RingoJS (the other platform in that benchmark). I've made th…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1525582
I submitted a Ringo talk to JSConf.eu 2010, haven't heard anything back from these guys so far. If that fails, I may apply for next JSConf.us. We'll get the word out there eventual…
-
comment
Comment #1500171
We use Jetty's ability to do both sync and async HTTP in RingoJS. I've written about it here: http://hns.github.com/2010/07/02/versatility.html I think Netty is great if you want f…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1455634
I know, i read that post. I'm planning to do a Node/Ringo comet comparison soon, and memory usage/max connections will be a part of that.
-
comment
Comment #1454936
Comparing comet performance between node and ringo should be interesting. Ringo uses jetty/cometd, so it should scale pretty decently as well. My guess is that node will use less m…