Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — hagbarth

hagbarth

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jun 21, 2015, 3:50 PM UTC
HN karma
403
Public activity
124 items

About hagbarth

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48752332

    No you will still get access to newer models on the subscription. You should have access to Sonnet 5, which is new. It's just Mythos class models that are API only. For now... You …

  2. comment
    Comment #48752199

    It was not.

  3. comment
    Comment #48565809

    Yes, but I don’t see either of those scenarios giving them the growth needed to justify a trillion dollar valuation. Especially with the current competition (a competitor releases …

  4. comment
    Comment #48554464

    Well. $60b in bloated stock is probably much better than the $10b cash penalty for not going through with the deal.

  5. comment
    Comment #48472089

    The alternative is to be explicit when you nerf, so users know what they are working with.

  6. comment
    Comment #48366695

    Because 5 days is not enough for the market to discover the price of SpaceX. And the rules were changed so the float is weighted as if it was much much larger than it is.

  7. comment
    Comment #47438419

    Danish public broadcaster. Probably the best reputation in the world on Danish news.

  8. comment
    Comment #47285914

    Do you have any hard lines for what an AI should be able to generate for you?

  9. comment
    Comment #47204630

    > Do you have evidence for that? Check the post history. It’s pretty obvious

  10. comment
    Comment #47087946

    I have no idea why they would do that. Outside blatant corruption, which we shouldn't discount.

  11. comment
    Comment #47012753

    Also if a person always wanted to write a book I don’t think prompting an AI will scratch that itch.

  12. comment
    Comment #47012684

    Except the models don’t actually compute anything other than text generation. The entire way they interact with computers is through the shell or other api layers on the OS

  13. comment
    Comment #46815730

    > and might be the renaissance for small to one person game studios. Indie games are already bigger than ever as far as I know.

  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #46693607

    This isn’t a political move. It’s a pension fund derisking a small part of their investments by moving them out of a riskier asset.

  16. comment
    Comment #46690813

    For rentals I get that. We own 2 EVs and a charger at home. Easiest driving experience ever. We just plug it in.

  17. comment
    Comment #46329306

    Graphite predates AI code reviews. Obviously includes it now, but the original selling point was support for stacking PRs.

  18. comment
    Comment #46273767

    I've seen this statement before. I'm not sure why my nation winning AI, whatever that means (first to AGI?), is better for me than some other nation?

  19. comment
    Comment #46229161

    Ah yes, proving a negative. What makes you sure a stone is not capable of cognition?

  20. comment
    Comment #46198152

    Revenue is all up. And as far as I can see beating expectations.

  21. comment
    Comment #46152569

    > People think that because AI cannot replace a senior dev, it's a worthless con. Quite the strawman. There are many points between “worthless” and “worth 100s of billions to trill…

  22. comment
    Comment #45984785

    Sam Altman has been drumming[1] the ASI drum for a while now. I don't think it's a stretch to say that this is the vision he is selling. [1] - https://ia.samaltman.com/#:~:text=we%…

  23. comment
    Comment #45984614

    If you read a little further in the article, the main point is _not_ that AI is useless. But rather than AGI god building, a regular technology. A valuable one, but not infinite gr…

  24. comment
    Comment #45927067

    I believe AlphaFold, AlphaEvolve etc are _not_ looking to get to AGI. The whole article is a case against AGI chasing, not ML or LLM overall.

  25. comment
    Comment #45900296

    "You're absolutely right!"