Viewing profile — goodthenandnow
goodthenandnow
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 09, 2020, 10:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 92
- Public activity
- 33 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About goodthenandnow
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48692733
That station is said to be one of the signals used by the UK’s nuclear subs to assess the state of the country in a war scenario. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letters_of_last_reso…
-
comment
Comment #46765907
Subthread from a while ago where I wrote some details on how Android sandboxing architecture uses Linux’s primitives: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40676309
-
comment
Comment #40678067
> I'd argue that permissions aren't really enforced by binder, just binder is used to talk to the endpoints that enforce permissions. Binder has no interaction with SELinux outside…
-
comment
Comment #40677193
> the system described in the post is mostly about taking away I agree. The hard part is, as usual, on the details. How do you take away stuff so that you still end up with an usab…
-
comment
Comment #40677109
Android blocks most of Linux syscalls with seccomp. They make heavy usage of SELinux. Binder is not just a simple IPC system. It requires userspace parts which aren't even the part…
-
comment
Comment #40676683
Not sure if this is what you meant, but I'd like to expand a little bit on it. - This API should be programming language agnostic (like, with a well defined ABI). Ideally an IPC ba…
-
comment
Comment #40676569
I understood the ideia and agree with it. Just want to point out that starting an OS from scratch, even if reusing an existing kernel, is a monstrous epic. I find it difficult that…
-
comment
Comment #40676508
Because Linux, the kernel, as well as other Unixes, don't have the right abstractions to easily build these. And there's all the old cruft. Just look at what Android had to do to i…
- story
-
comment
Comment #38136204
The ones I could find: Samsung: https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/q/owner:sukka.kim@sa... https://fuchsia-review.googlesource.com/q/owner:j_yoon.choi@... Amlogic: https://fuc…
-
comment
Comment #38130207
> Could I theoretically use it in my linux program just like any other IPC mechanism? Yes, absolutely. However, binder is implemented as a kernel module not enabled by default, so …
-
comment
Comment #38127757
Yes, since quite some time.
-
comment
Comment #38127730
Also, as mentioned in the patch's message, it's important to highlight that binder is a core component of Android. Its usage is so widespread that, to me, it kinda makes Android ar…
-
comment
Comment #38127637
Trivia: Fuchsia's starnix also has its own implementation of binder [1] and it's written is Rust too (as are most Fuchsia components). [1]: https://cs.opensource.google/fuchsia/fuc…
-
comment
Comment #38016812
> One thing though, you focus a lot on syscalls, but I think the challenge in recent years has been to find new ways to have kernel userspace interactions _outside_ of syscall, whi…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #33210307
> the composition problem Would these be like the “easy problems” then? Besides, wouldn't that be exactly like our current physics? (Where we reduce until we find something fundame…
-
comment
Comment #33209544
> Nobody (that I'm aware of) suggests that there is an experience within the electronic circuit There is a theory, Integrated Information Theory (IIT) [0], which argues exactly tha…
-
comment
Comment #29345183
Fuchsia has an http client component [0][1] which is part of the platform and, given Fuchsia's component architecture, it's accessed through a message-passing protocol [2] which is…
- story
-
comment
Comment #28470231
They are doing this to solve the chicken-and-egg problem of booting the adoption of Fuchsia. Without Android (ie. Linux) support, there's no way to pull off Fuchsia.
-
comment
Comment #28470025
They have a deadline profile available for threads, and plans to implement an actual deadline scheduler. So, this is confusing.
-
comment
Comment #27006112
This. Wondering how we're going to remember the times before proper capability based security systems go mainstream...