Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — freejazz

freejazz

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 05, 2020, 9:57 PM UTC
HN karma
1,792
Public activity
2,958 items

About freejazz

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49224372

    >So because you have an anecdote, I must be lying? It's called common sense. You asked what my experience is. I know you're lying because you don't pass the sniff test and you're a…

  2. comment
    Comment #49224152

    >What experience do you have with the eviction process? My family has owned brownstones in new york my entire life and their experiences are quite different than yours. >Why would …

  3. comment
    Comment #49223817

    It sure is convenient when you just completely make up counterfactuals to suit yourself

  4. comment
    Comment #49223773

    The entire premise of this article is a hypothetical

  5. comment
    Comment #49172199

    That's a bit hyperbolic when we're all just posting on HN

  6. comment
    Comment #49172191

    Everyone here is talking about LLMs, why bother calling them something else

  7. comment
    Comment #49171699

    Can't call it AI like that without discrediting yourself. You mean LLMs?

  8. comment
    Comment #49171510

    > This should be shown in court "Weak security" isn't a defense to theft, so probably wont. >Seems inappropriate for OpenAI to post this public-appeal, to me. They are desperate an…

  9. comment
    Comment #49171431

    >Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. Why? Apple surely doesn't want to and why should they?

  10. comment
    Comment #49083410

    Come on, what would they need to learn that wasn't already "trained" by the LLMs ingestion of his works in the first instance??

  11. comment
    Comment #49071682

    This but instead it's people insisting that AI will replace my job (been three months out for at least 3 years now) because they know it involves words.

  12. comment
    Comment #49070704

    I don't know which company the OP belongs to in particular, but searching online reveals plenty of similar cos.

  13. comment
    Comment #49069497

    Why would you need to shred a book from the 1800s when it is in the public domain? Something is fishy here.

  14. comment
    Comment #49069482

    Geez - their LLMs couldn't figure it out?

  15. comment
    Comment #49027306

    You've replied to several of my posts in this thread, no need to play a fool

  16. comment
    Comment #49025434

    I guess you'd prefer to enjoy significantly fewer works mainly consisting of stories told through oral tradition. Some of us like movies!

  17. comment
    Comment #49025423

    No one is suing over what you wrote on Geocities in 1995...

  18. comment
    Comment #49025406

    The idea that art was made at all contradicts a premise offered by no one

  19. comment
    Comment #49025395

    >The entire thesis of my commrnt is copyright is not that. Your entire thesis is false on its face. One does not need a big publisher to get published or make there work available.…

  20. comment
    Comment #49013157

    That's a big leap

  21. comment
    Comment #49010072

    >If money is the only incentive, then it's not a product of artistic work. This is just bullshit and no one said it's the only incentive. > There are a lot of alternative ways to f…

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #49010057

    >There needs to be a way to support the creation of art. Yeah, it's called "copyright."

  24. comment
    Comment #49010032

    Sorry, I'm thinking of Kadrey , where the court rejected Anthropic's "training" argument and provided an explanation as to how author litigants should demonstrate market harm in or…

  25. comment
    Comment #49009858

    > if you can't persuade the machine to spit substantially the same text back out verbatim That's exactly what they've done in a number of the lawsuits, so I'm not sure why you thin…