Viewing profile — freejazz
freejazz
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 05, 2020, 9:57 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,792
- Public activity
- 2,958 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About freejazz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49224372
>So because you have an anecdote, I must be lying? It's called common sense. You asked what my experience is. I know you're lying because you don't pass the sniff test and you're a…
-
comment
Comment #49224152
>What experience do you have with the eviction process? My family has owned brownstones in new york my entire life and their experiences are quite different than yours. >Why would …
-
comment
Comment #49223817
It sure is convenient when you just completely make up counterfactuals to suit yourself
-
comment
Comment #49223773
The entire premise of this article is a hypothetical
-
comment
Comment #49172199
That's a bit hyperbolic when we're all just posting on HN
-
comment
Comment #49172191
Everyone here is talking about LLMs, why bother calling them something else
-
comment
Comment #49171699
Can't call it AI like that without discrediting yourself. You mean LLMs?
-
comment
Comment #49171510
> This should be shown in court "Weak security" isn't a defense to theft, so probably wont. >Seems inappropriate for OpenAI to post this public-appeal, to me. They are desperate an…
-
comment
Comment #49171431
>Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. Why? Apple surely doesn't want to and why should they?
-
comment
Comment #49083410
Come on, what would they need to learn that wasn't already "trained" by the LLMs ingestion of his works in the first instance??
-
comment
Comment #49071682
This but instead it's people insisting that AI will replace my job (been three months out for at least 3 years now) because they know it involves words.
-
comment
Comment #49070704
I don't know which company the OP belongs to in particular, but searching online reveals plenty of similar cos.
-
comment
Comment #49069497
Why would you need to shred a book from the 1800s when it is in the public domain? Something is fishy here.
-
comment
Comment #49069482
Geez - their LLMs couldn't figure it out?
-
comment
Comment #49027306
You've replied to several of my posts in this thread, no need to play a fool
-
comment
Comment #49025434
I guess you'd prefer to enjoy significantly fewer works mainly consisting of stories told through oral tradition. Some of us like movies!
-
comment
Comment #49025423
No one is suing over what you wrote on Geocities in 1995...
-
comment
Comment #49025406
The idea that art was made at all contradicts a premise offered by no one
-
comment
Comment #49025395
>The entire thesis of my commrnt is copyright is not that. Your entire thesis is false on its face. One does not need a big publisher to get published or make there work available.…
-
comment
Comment #49013157
That's a big leap
-
comment
Comment #49010072
>If money is the only incentive, then it's not a product of artistic work. This is just bullshit and no one said it's the only incentive. > There are a lot of alternative ways to f…
-
comment
Comment #49010066
And?
-
comment
Comment #49010057
>There needs to be a way to support the creation of art. Yeah, it's called "copyright."
-
comment
Comment #49010032
Sorry, I'm thinking of Kadrey , where the court rejected Anthropic's "training" argument and provided an explanation as to how author litigants should demonstrate market harm in or…
-
comment
Comment #49009858
> if you can't persuade the machine to spit substantially the same text back out verbatim That's exactly what they've done in a number of the lawsuits, so I'm not sure why you thin…