Viewing profile — flyryan
flyryan
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 20, 2010, 7:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About flyryan
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/flyryan; my proof: https://keybase.io/flyryan/sigs/fwvJ5PmXoNblZiWTRaTD1YHpJA53OCcIiTPY65KPmm8 ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10783091
I wish I could base my arguments on things that are going to happen 30 years from now.
-
comment
Comment #10617042
Since Dell holds a ton of government contracts and a good amount of government computers are Dell, you can guarantee they most DEFINITELY "give a shit" about this.
-
comment
Comment #10228077
This is why I have an issue with Project Zero. You will NEVER patch all the 0days. There are only a few bugs that I've seen that were so impactful (Heartbleed for example) that it …
-
comment
Comment #10227968
You're stating that the organization "as a whole" is "blatantly" violating the Constitution. Don't you see why your statement is being challenged? It's largely baseless. At most, a…
-
comment
Comment #10023023
Patrick Wardle dropped two Little Snitch bypasses at BlackHat [1] this year. [1] https://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-15/materials/us-15-Wardle-W... [PDF Warning]
-
comment
Comment #9897664
The documents regarding that incident were pulled from an Inspector General's folder regarding an open investigation. That hadn't shown themselves to be anything. They were activel…
-
comment
Comment #9897628
Fox? He used the Constitution to definite the terms. Are you arguing against the Constitutional definition of what a traitor is? What definition would you want him tried on in cour…
-
comment
Comment #9752314
VMWare. It takes advantage of the fact that VMWare links guest VMs to the host's printers by default and takes advantage of that link. The patch from VMWare even applied to VMWare …
-
comment
Comment #9752230
Wait... you believe that the NSA is easier to compromise than the computers of reporters from multiple international news agencies with various levels of computer security policies…
-
comment
Comment #9578651
Here's the problem with the Boston Marathon attack; it was planned and conducted by US citizens in the USA without any planning with any foreigners. When someone says "the NSA coul…
-
comment
Comment #9578579
Where can I find the source? I could actually make use of this.
-
comment
Comment #9506320
What about the other side of the coin though? there has been an attack -see! the NSA can't even prevent single incident X and are doing NOTHING to protect us! there hasn't been a l…
-
comment
Comment #9186895
Schneier is also the one who said these are the types of things the NSA should be doing[1]. [1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/12/more_about_th...
-
comment
Comment #9181702
My point is that you were arguing against targeted collection. Going after individual devices is a scoped and precision form of intelligence collection. You were saying that this t…
-
comment
Comment #9181099
The USA has never needed a search warrant to conduct foreign intelligence. A search warrant requirement is a 4th amendment protection afforded to US citizens. Foreign intelligence …
-
comment
Comment #9179531
"Then if the NSA" That's a big IF and one that will be almost impossible to prove. I don't see how the case holds any merit if they can't prove this happens.
-
comment
Comment #9177676
Your example isn't a particular good one. Huawei has been accused of backdooring their products for the Chinese government on numerous occasions, including presentations at DEFCON …
-
comment
Comment #6995935
"I did not break the official algorithm. I do not know the secret value used to compute the Q constant, and thus cannot break the default implementation. Only NSA (and people with …