Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — farcical_tinpot

farcical_tinpot

HN member
Joined
Mon, May 09, 2016, 3:17 PM UTC
HN karma
108
Public activity
77 items

About farcical_tinpot

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #12560938

    You're the one publicising him and funnelling traffic to his blog, but, hey, ho.

  2. comment
    Comment #12560907

    > What alternative reality do you live in? A short unsubstantiated single sentence-fragment from an unnamed, untitled support employee on a random fucking forum is not a "precise s…

  3. comment
    Comment #12558738

    I'm not the first person to accuse Matthew of this I'm afraid, and use exactly those words. If you're going to censor comments then feel free to do so for the nonsensical articles …

  4. comment
    Comment #12558604

    Adverb..... Bloody auto-complete.....

  5. comment
    Comment #12558598

    > Literally nothing about this sentence is correct. Sorry, but literally everything about it is correct. What a great adjective. > Support reps know nothing, and nameless support r…

  6. comment
    Comment #12558555

    It would be awesome if you knew what you were talking about ;-).

  7. comment
    Comment #12558549

    There is no way that using a fake RAID set of drivers and a completely incompatible and more complex on-disk RAID format is going to increase performance in any way. There's a reas…

  8. comment
    Comment #12558504

    The statement is there in black and white and it is as crystal clear and unequivocal as you can get.

  9. comment
    Comment #12558489

    > Hardware that works better = better sales, more money, less support cost? Utter bullshit. The hardware doesn't work better - it works in the same way that AHCI systems with a sin…

  10. comment
    Comment #12553113

    > even Microsoft don't ship a driver that supports it. .....and why do you suppose that is? Fake RAID drivers and hardware are shit that's why. It's an option that is hardly used, …

  11. comment
    Comment #12553097

    > Or, alternatively, they removed a firmware setting that makes their hardware work less well Why would they remove it? Removing it requires effort, which hardware companies are lo…

  12. comment
    Comment #12553081

    Why not? They're always generally the most truthful.

  13. comment
    Comment #12553076

    Garrett has a history of stonewalling and misdirection on these matters. It was the same with UEFI, Secure Boot and when he and Red Hat tried to casually shoehorn support for PE bi…

  14. comment
    Comment #12553065

    > The idea that a single customer support representative would know something When you work at a company you have a funny way of finding things out, and you don't say things on for…

  15. comment
    Comment #12553049

    It would run Windows though ;-).

  16. comment
    Comment #12553046

    Yay, so supporting completely non-standard and inevitably more buggy drivers is the correct option?

  17. comment
    Comment #12553033

    Because providing that option doesn't give anyone sub-par drivers? Also, the power saving stuff is bollocks. I never thought I would see the day when anyone would recommend using a…

  18. comment
    Comment #12553023

    Every other chipset and motherboard in existence has had that option and it hasn't affected anyone adversely. There is no less of two evils. There isn't any evils here.

  19. comment
    Comment #12552998

    It's not Secure Boot - yet. But this is what you're going to find - obsolescence depending on built-in hardware driver support. Not only are you not getting Linux installed on here…

  20. comment
    Comment #12552964

    Correction, they only support on version of that OS - which is the point here. To claim you're going to get better battery life with a fake RAID driver is also one of the funniest …

  21. comment
    Comment #12552944

    Seeing a manufacturer use fake RAID, by default, on a single disk system, then unfathomably hardwiring this into the firmware so it can't be changed, then have a Lenovo rep actuall…

  22. comment
    Comment #12552676

    So get a vanilla install disk from Microsoft's site, install and reuse the license.

  23. comment
    Comment #12552667

    Which won't work.

  24. comment
    Comment #12552658

    That should be you might be able to get an OS they're not keen on booted , of course.

  25. comment
    Comment #12552646

    ....and indeed, there are only Windows 10 drivers. http://support.lenovo.com/gb/en/products/Laptops-and-netbook... WTF is that URL by the way? Many Skylake systems are like this to…