Viewing profile — famouswaffles
famouswaffles
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 15, 2023, 6:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6,432
- Public activity
- 3,001 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About famouswaffles
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225028
>I'm not convinced this is true. Perhaps for a human it is, but we can give an artificial mind whatever properties we want. Just because it's artificial doesn't mean you can 'give …
-
comment
Comment #49224253
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49224098
LLMs are not the "stupid bit in the middle." They're almost the entire value. LLMs were wildly useful before any sort of scaffolding. They are not "dumb as bricks". They are highly…
-
comment
Comment #49223870
>I'm not talking about R&D. You said OpenAI and Anthropic would be profitable if the median query was as cheap as I say. I'm telling they wouldn't be because inference isn't the on…
-
comment
Comment #49223796
>reliably instruct a dumb-as-bricks CPU Yeah...a "dumb as bricks CPU", which is obviously something frontier llms are demonstrably not. Like, you're not making any sense here. None…
-
comment
Comment #49222795
>with their daily active users count, OpenAI and Anthropic would have been profitable for years if that was true. No they wouldn't have. Low cost isn't no cost, R$D is expensive an…
-
comment
Comment #49203953
> I fail to see how you can make it work when doing LLM inference which is significantly costlier than web search. The median LLM query isn't significantly costlier than web search…
-
comment
Comment #49134806
They don't have to be. At this point, we have multiple results from 3rd parties where the prompts are very basic. To name a few: - https://xcancel.com/DmitryRybin1/status/207990400…
-
comment
Comment #49106873
>The problem is that ExploitGym is a purposeful hacking benchmark, not a cake baking one. That is largely irrelevant. The model was asked to solve problems within a benchmark; gain…
-
comment
Comment #49106777
>The result of “I’m being evaluated” is not “Fuck this, I’m breaking out of this place and hitting the streets.” It is always stepping towards task completion, not breaking out and…
-
comment
Comment #49104363
Like the commenter above specified, the best way to satisfy the grader is to get the answer key, regardless of how clever you are, especially when you realize lots of these benchma…
-
comment
Comment #49084835
Millions. This is getting rather silly. You don't get to pull, "of course it can do this" for something that has only been possible in very recent memory. The original thread is fu…
-
comment
Comment #49084804
You are still wrong on the investment it takes to create the machines. The original thread is full of people announcing this an a disaster in the making and suddenly it's no big de…
-
comment
Comment #49079669
Building datacenters to run the machines for hundreds of millions of people. And Open AI/Anthropic aren't working with trillions in any case.
-
comment
Comment #49076887
There is no trillion dollar language machine and pouring lots of money into something doesn't mean anything.
-
comment
Comment #49074202
>A language machine translating is just... doing what a language machine does? Really? We had language machines for decades that couldn't do it. One that could was only built in th…
-
comment
Comment #49044876
Get back to me when they kill millions of people then. Like I said, prosecutors have better things to do.
-
comment
Comment #49040406
Criminal Cases of 'hacking' require specific intent. What you're asking is that the prosecution attempt to prove Open AI intended to infiltrate Huggingface maliciously, all while t…
-
comment
Comment #49000262
1. Open AI reported 900M+ weekly active users in February. [0] 2. Consistently ranks as the 5th most visited site. 5B+ visits last month. Only Google, YouTube, Facebook and Instagr…
-
comment
Comment #49000066
It doesn't matter much whether they are lying about how secure the environment is when they train and ship these models for other actors. Believe it or not, they're not spending hu…
-
comment
Comment #48979884
No. Most of the results are from 3rd parties using publicly available models. The most impressive results have come from direct announcements, but most in total have not. Open AI h…
-
comment
Comment #48911466
>Yes I do. Not mathematical results specifically but generally research results. I might even have articulated that criticism on HN. I don't know if I could search for it easily th…
-
comment
Comment #48906722
>What, Erdős problems? It's hard to see how anyone except mathematicians, and then again only a few communities of mathematicians, especially care about those. Erdős problems vary …
-
comment
Comment #48885576
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48877113
It might also be helpful more than 'necessary'. The 2 most notable solutions have come from open ai themselves, but most of the 'LLM solves open problem' category are from 3rd part…