Viewing profile — fa3556
fa3556
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 22, 2025, 6:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 32
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fa3556
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46505902
Xiaomi phones also have it but you can block Wi-Fi only for user (non system) apps. However you can block mobile data access to all apps. None of the Samsungs I have owned so far h…
-
comment
Comment #46374637
Tweaks are divided into essential and advanced. The essential ones shouldn't have any negative impact on the system. They also document the changes each tweak makes (so you can und…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46173029
Maybe. The appeal of distros like these is lost on those who know linux well. If you are new to linux, the difference between Aurora/Bazzite/Bluefin and base fedora (silverblue, ki…
-
comment
Comment #46107269
I feel like the ship has sailed for X11 or any fork of it, regardless of its technical merits (or the lack thereof). All the major DEs (KDE, Gnome, COSMIC) are either already wayla…
-
comment
Comment #45830574
You could use the about:config preference browser.profiles.enabled in the meantime I suppose.
-
comment
Comment #45830514
No I don't use sync at all. I think it might just require `browser.profiles.enabled` to be set to true in about:config, at least until wider rollout.
-
comment
Comment #45830113
You can (now?) create profiles from the account icon in the toolbar [1] and at least on my firefox install, you can also do it from the hamburger menu. I use firefox via flatpak an…
-
comment
Comment #45311478
I understood GP's point to be that because Obsidian leaves a lot of functionality to plugins, most people are going to use unverified third party plugins. On arch however most pack…
-
comment
Comment #45311168
I think this criticism is unfair because most common packages are covered by the core and extra repos which are maintained by Arch Linux. AUR is a collection of user build scripts …
- story
-
comment
Comment #44988323
I feel like the only other solution to kernel-level anticheat is some kind of measured and verified system image. The whole chain has to be signed and trusted from the TPM through …