Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — esarbe

esarbe

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 01, 2015, 2:06 PM UTC
HN karma
2,308
Public activity
1,327 items

About esarbe

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48858677

    I find this a very reasonable frame of mind. Systemic issues and failures cannot be fixed or addressed by individual action. They have to be addressed in a systemic way. It's good …

  2. comment
    Comment #48744203

    You sound like you've swallowed pro-US-propaganda hook, line and sinker. The reason the middle-east is at constant war is because colonialist machinations. Same goes for south-Saha…

  3. comment
    Comment #48664326

    > But we are also: an email company built around privacy; an open source AI startup focused on developers; a place for people to create and share data on their own terms; and an in…

  4. comment
    Comment #48621829

    Now you are just throwing everything at the wall and hope it sticks. You're essentially shifting to a "sure, reactors are expensive, but the whole-system price is lower" argument. …

  5. comment
    Comment #48610538

    No, my concern is that France will have to spend around €150-200 billion in the next ten years just to keep their current capacity. I guess that's the reason that they went for ren…

  6. comment
    Comment #48596846

    These €50 billion is just what EDF is in debt, not what building and operating these reactors actually cost. Just in the next 10 years EDF will have in invest about €150-200 billio…

  7. comment
    Comment #48591934

    The same way that France did it; by building quite safe nuclear in series with massive government subsidies. A bit like China today. After the accidents showed that these designs w…

  8. comment
    Comment #48591168

    I'm not actually that concerned about excessive government spending. I just don't like wasteful spending, and that's what nuclear is. Wind and PV build up much faster, are orders o…

  9. comment
    Comment #48589241

    No reactor has yet even reached the operating age of 60 years. That 80 years number is wholly speculative. We stopped building nuclear reactors in the 1970ies[0] because with the a…

  10. comment
    Comment #48588919

    Ah, yes - "the evil environmentalists." Congratulations, you really torched that straw man. We stopped building nuclear reactors in the early 1970ies[0], long before there was any …

  11. comment
    Comment #48588699

    There's no false information there. Nuclear is complex and so expensive that despite 70 years of tinkering and trying it hasn't managed to make a noticeable dent in fossil fuel. It…

  12. comment
    Comment #48588633

    There's no measure by which nuclear energy is the "energy of the future". It's too complex, too expensive and it doesn't scale. SMRs are proving to be a fever dream with ever risin…

  13. comment
    Comment #48588522

    It's also incredibly expensive and brittle and cannot be moderated without additional costs[1]. At this point nuclear is just a dead horse. It hasn't managed to displace fossil fue…

  14. comment
    Comment #48586376

    No it's not. If scientific investigation shows that there are many causes that have a relevant impact on "A", then saying that "A has multiple relevant and possible causes" is not …

  15. comment
    Comment #48578365

    Watson's comments are not based in scientific fact. First of - there is no such thing as a "race". Putting people in classes based on the colour of their skin is ludicrously simpli…

  16. comment
    Comment #48578226

    That human industrial activities are the primary direct causation of the currently observed climate change is a scientific fact, proven beyond any reasonable doubt. What you show i…

  17. comment
    Comment #48578169

    It's more than just "that one president". It's the whole system that brought him to power, where a large part of the population has been trained to hate and fear for almost half a …

  18. comment
    Comment #48575889

    There have been many systemic changes since we started to understand the physical mechanism behind climate change and the dire consequences of unmitigated climate change. Within 20…

  19. comment
    Comment #48575276

    The link is in the title.

  20. comment
    Comment #48574896

    That's a straw man argument. Voluntarily opting out of a high-CO2 lifestyle will do exactly nothing. Demanding that anyone recognizing the threat of climate change and demanding a …

  21. comment
    Comment #48574688

    That's a ludicrous proposal. A whole planets' society's structural problems cannot be solved by an individuals action. Your own attitude explains the 'why'. This is a systemic issu…

  22. comment
    Comment #48558199

    Very well put, thank you.

  23. comment
    Comment #48552400

    Capitalists make use of authoritarian governments. They go hand in hand. What do you think slavery is?

  24. comment
    Comment #48552369

    1. Maybe living as hunter-gatherers would make them happier. 2. You can't live as a hunter-gatherers because the land has been enclosed and privatized. There's no choice involved h…

  25. comment
    Comment #48552348

    Of course he is. Nobody gets that rich without throwing overboard any morals or ethics. You won't become a billionaire - let alone a trillionaire - if you are bothered by the wellb…