Viewing profile — esarbe
esarbe
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 01, 2015, 2:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,308
- Public activity
- 1,327 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About esarbe
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48858677
I find this a very reasonable frame of mind. Systemic issues and failures cannot be fixed or addressed by individual action. They have to be addressed in a systemic way. It's good …
-
comment
Comment #48744203
You sound like you've swallowed pro-US-propaganda hook, line and sinker. The reason the middle-east is at constant war is because colonialist machinations. Same goes for south-Saha…
-
comment
Comment #48664326
> But we are also: an email company built around privacy; an open source AI startup focused on developers; a place for people to create and share data on their own terms; and an in…
-
comment
Comment #48621829
Now you are just throwing everything at the wall and hope it sticks. You're essentially shifting to a "sure, reactors are expensive, but the whole-system price is lower" argument. …
-
comment
Comment #48610538
No, my concern is that France will have to spend around €150-200 billion in the next ten years just to keep their current capacity. I guess that's the reason that they went for ren…
-
comment
Comment #48596846
These €50 billion is just what EDF is in debt, not what building and operating these reactors actually cost. Just in the next 10 years EDF will have in invest about €150-200 billio…
-
comment
Comment #48591934
The same way that France did it; by building quite safe nuclear in series with massive government subsidies. A bit like China today. After the accidents showed that these designs w…
-
comment
Comment #48591168
I'm not actually that concerned about excessive government spending. I just don't like wasteful spending, and that's what nuclear is. Wind and PV build up much faster, are orders o…
-
comment
Comment #48589241
No reactor has yet even reached the operating age of 60 years. That 80 years number is wholly speculative. We stopped building nuclear reactors in the 1970ies[0] because with the a…
-
comment
Comment #48588919
Ah, yes - "the evil environmentalists." Congratulations, you really torched that straw man. We stopped building nuclear reactors in the early 1970ies[0], long before there was any …
-
comment
Comment #48588699
There's no false information there. Nuclear is complex and so expensive that despite 70 years of tinkering and trying it hasn't managed to make a noticeable dent in fossil fuel. It…
-
comment
Comment #48588633
There's no measure by which nuclear energy is the "energy of the future". It's too complex, too expensive and it doesn't scale. SMRs are proving to be a fever dream with ever risin…
-
comment
Comment #48588522
It's also incredibly expensive and brittle and cannot be moderated without additional costs[1]. At this point nuclear is just a dead horse. It hasn't managed to displace fossil fue…
-
comment
Comment #48586376
No it's not. If scientific investigation shows that there are many causes that have a relevant impact on "A", then saying that "A has multiple relevant and possible causes" is not …
-
comment
Comment #48578365
Watson's comments are not based in scientific fact. First of - there is no such thing as a "race". Putting people in classes based on the colour of their skin is ludicrously simpli…
-
comment
Comment #48578226
That human industrial activities are the primary direct causation of the currently observed climate change is a scientific fact, proven beyond any reasonable doubt. What you show i…
-
comment
Comment #48578169
It's more than just "that one president". It's the whole system that brought him to power, where a large part of the population has been trained to hate and fear for almost half a …
-
comment
Comment #48575889
There have been many systemic changes since we started to understand the physical mechanism behind climate change and the dire consequences of unmitigated climate change. Within 20…
-
comment
Comment #48575276
The link is in the title.
-
comment
Comment #48574896
That's a straw man argument. Voluntarily opting out of a high-CO2 lifestyle will do exactly nothing. Demanding that anyone recognizing the threat of climate change and demanding a …
-
comment
Comment #48574688
That's a ludicrous proposal. A whole planets' society's structural problems cannot be solved by an individuals action. Your own attitude explains the 'why'. This is a systemic issu…
-
comment
Comment #48558199
Very well put, thank you.
-
comment
Comment #48552400
Capitalists make use of authoritarian governments. They go hand in hand. What do you think slavery is?
-
comment
Comment #48552369
1. Maybe living as hunter-gatherers would make them happier. 2. You can't live as a hunter-gatherers because the land has been enclosed and privatized. There's no choice involved h…
-
comment
Comment #48552348
Of course he is. Nobody gets that rich without throwing overboard any morals or ethics. You won't become a billionaire - let alone a trillionaire - if you are bothered by the wellb…