Viewing profile — epolanski
epolanski
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 14, 2020, 6:28 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 13,277
- Public activity
- 5,338 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About epolanski
Mostly interested in functional programming and effect systems.
contact me at
enricopolanski at gmail dot com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49226133
You can look and Google for many polls conducted on the topic, 2014 was the first year more Poles had a negative than a positive opinion on the PRL (46 vs 44%) and that's because a…
-
comment
Comment #49225501
You are right this is a disease of modernity, not much about Polish transition from PRL.
-
comment
Comment #49224136
Yeah, January 2021 says no.
-
comment
Comment #49224128
/r/thathappened
-
comment
Comment #49224113
Yes.
-
comment
Comment #49224101
No, they were not, why would you assume so? Communist party was very unpopular in Poland, even though registering was free and had benefits no more than 2.5% of poles ever signed t…
-
comment
Comment #49222844
Nope, having lived here for a decade with a polish girlfriend doesn't make you an expert in polish society. Not having had generations and generations of Polish parents and grandpa…
-
comment
Comment #49222213
That separation of powers exists and existed in all the modern democratic presidential and semi presidential republics that failed to avoid the authoritarian turn. Winner-takes-all…
-
comment
Comment #49222150
Of course, why would I, a Pole from as many generations as I can go back in time, know about it better that an expat? 1. Living in Poland does not mean knowing how Poles think abou…
-
comment
Comment #49221314
I'm Polish and your statement is absolutely false. Things were simply different. My family had an absolutely happy life for all the generations that followed WW2.
-
comment
Comment #49221300
Me too, Poland, but I don't share the sentiment a bit. I'm not denying things are better now, but they are also much more complex, people socialize way less, neighborhoods that wer…
-
comment
Comment #49221259
At times I think about how democracies, especially those plagued by winner-takes-all mechanics like presidential and semi-presidential republics, can pretend to be democratic while…
-
comment
Comment #49220796
That's speculation. Let alone the fact that you can weaken civilian resolve better by hitting logistical hubs and energy infrastructure.
-
comment
Comment #49220788
Not really, interception success rate fell from 37% to 7% as Iskanders got upgraded.
-
comment
Comment #49217782
I only buy phones if the current one starts showing signs of deterioration, mostly battery. I swear a midrange Chinese phone from 2017 would be enough for me in 2026 to read HN/Wha…
-
comment
Comment #49217255
Not sure what does it have to do with Patriot stock piling or the effectiveness of asymmetric warfare.
-
comment
Comment #49217244
Those are more likely to be misses than deliberate attacks. There's no value in striking apartment blocks void of military equipments. You don't spend money to do so if you can hit…
-
comment
Comment #49216802
There is one major difference from previous technological advancements: AI is going to hit many if not most sectors at the same time. And it's not like hitting just one sector has …
-
comment
Comment #49216609
God forbids your relatives ever touch computers!
-
comment
Comment #49216447
Both this event as well as the Iranian campaign expose the low stock piles that most NATO countries are facing. But it's also exposing the effectiveness of asymmetric warfare. A si…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49212144
It's ironic since your comment was clearly written with AI. Apparently even an HN comment didn't deserve human writing.
-
comment
Comment #49210743
Job numbers have always been reviewed down after being released every single time since 2022.
-
comment
Comment #49210306
the current administration is the key word. In any case, you can't expect stable policies in a country with a winner-takes-all democracy.
-
comment
Comment #49209825
US exports energy, China imports it. Not sure what is there to argue.