Viewing profile — elpool2
elpool2
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 12, 2012, 1:14 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 463
- Public activity
- 147 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About elpool2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47524050
That seems unworkable because, well, I just don’t want social media to be dumb pipes. Without sites making editorial decisions every site will be full of porn and animal torture vi…
-
comment
Comment #47521209
Actually, it looks like there is something in the law that only provides DMCA safe harbor to providers that have a policy of terminating accounts of repeat infringers. I'm still no…
-
comment
Comment #47519507
I don’t see how it would ever make sense to hold social media liable for user posted defamation. Look at the recent Afroman defamation lawsuit and consider how YouTube is supposed …
-
comment
Comment #47519247
It seems like you would still have to remove the infringing content , but no need to disconnect or ban the user who shared it. But if you’re a pure ISP and not hosting content on y…
-
comment
Comment #45150642
But there is a difference between “illegal to regurgitate it” and “illegal to remember it”. IIRC in this case that settled the judge had ruled on “remember” (fair use) but not on t…
-
comment
Comment #43852417
As described in the ruling, Apple hired a consulting group to estimate how much value developers get from the iphone platform, which found that (1) Apple’s platform technology is w…
-
comment
Comment #43852019
"To hide the truth, Vice-President of Finance, Alex Roman, outright lied under oath" Yikes. I really thought Apple was going to get away with all their crazy restrictions they came…
-
comment
Comment #43718563
It would make sense if Apple decided to still have Google be their default, even without the payment. Not sure how likely that is though.
-
comment
Comment #41375333
Sure, it’s ok for them to decide what kind of content they want on their own platform. Edit: not ok for govt to coerce them into it though
-
comment
Comment #40320803
The right to forget is about removing personal information from a site, or removing articles about you from search results. An answer to a Stackoverflow question isn't really perso…
-
comment
Comment #39907504
I was responsible for drawing 1/25th of this gif back in the day. There was actually way more tiles created but this is one version that went viral. Crazy to see it still pop up li…
-
comment
Comment #39720619
It's fairly accurate though. The preliminary injunction in that case blocked government agencies from even talking to social media companies (though some of that got reversed by th…
-
comment
Comment #39619604
Do you have a link to the tweet from Sweeney saying he would breach the contract?
-
comment
Comment #39471987
I think everything you said was fair, but you also mentioned Twitter being a conservative cesspool, and a lot these features like federation and composable moderation are designed …
-
comment
Comment #39022406
Thanks and wow, they’re really doing everything imaginable to make it difficult to include such a link. And their rules say the link cannot contain any additional parameters so it …
-
comment
Comment #39015653
It will be interesting to see how far the anti-steering ruling actually goes. Will Apple still be able to block links to a alternative payment options? Or what if the link contains…
-
comment
Comment #38617967
What is there to enforce? There are no duties, obligations, or punishments in the law, it just provides an affirmative defense for lawsuits.
-
comment
Comment #38617363
The issue is that the way this is written the AI doesn't have to be responsible for the liable content, it just has to be involved . If I post something defamatory on HN, and HN he…
-
comment
Comment #37489207
Yeah but this video is clearly just transformers blowing. A block of street lights goes out the exact same time as one of the flashes.
-
comment
Comment #37388056
They have to pay for showing links, and those links do send traffic to news sites. That is indisputable. You’re phrasing is just incorrect, honestly. Linking to a website is not at…
-
comment
Comment #37386218
The part you quoted and called bullshit is factually correct though. CAN has told Meta and Google that if they show links to news sites (which do drive business to those sites) the…
-
comment
Comment #37386084
There are different degrees of “secure”, right? Maybe you could give a key to the FBI without China getting ahold of it, maybe it’s still “secure enough”. But you can’t say it’s “j…
-
comment
Comment #37253240
My company has been fully remote since 2020, I agree that collaboration is still easy. The sort of meetings where we used to sit in a conference room and brainstorm on a whiteboard…
-
comment
Comment #37031281
Because one of the things the negotiating framework covers is how much money google and meta must pay to news providers when news content is “made available” to canadians, and “mad…
-
comment
Comment #37028215
I’m on Google/meta’s side because link taxes are a bad idea for the internet as a whole. That anyone (even Meta, who I generally dislike) should have to pay to link to a news artic…