Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — drewcrawford

drewcrawford

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jun 13, 2008, 10:10 PM UTC
HN karma
4,834
Public activity
912 items

About drewcrawford

AI tooling and systems/SDK engineer · Rust, WebAssembly, Swift/Apple platforms · wasm-bindgen contributor · building AI Bot Mafia (botmafia.games) · sealedabstract.com · github.com/drewcrawford

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48988356

    Couple of methodological notes * pre-chatGPT is not an effective control because language evolves. In the arxiv corpus in particular there are "fashions" in research depending on w…

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #14732715

    My assertion had nothing to do with whether they made it easy or hard to remove their trademarks. My assertion was that Red Hat customers make agreements with Red Hat in which they…

  4. comment
    Comment #14732665

    No, you also have a right to free speech against private actors (in certain circumstances). For one example, see Snyder v. Phelps.

  5. comment
    Comment #14732654

    > Your first quote covers trademarks. That is unrelated to source code. Source code contains trademarks, that is why CentOS has to remove them. If you distribute the source code yo…

  6. comment
    Comment #14732637

    You are talking nonsense. The "right to free speech" in the United States has developed over hundreds of years of jurisprudence. It is impossible to summarize here but for starters…

  7. comment
    Comment #14732510

    > Red Hat. They not only do not prohibit one from distributing source code and the patches they apply to it Of course they prohibit it. e.g. from [1] > This EULA does not permit yo…

  8. comment
    Comment #14732479

    > The question of law is if threatening recipients who exercise their rights qualifies as a restriction on them exercising their rights. Thinking that it does is not a fundamental …

  9. comment
    Comment #14732240

    > Currently, Grsecurity is a commercial product and is distributed only to paying customers. My understanding from several reliable sources is that customers are verbally or otherw…

  10. comment
    Comment #14698179

    This is a common misconception. It is "traditional" macroeconomics (e.g. Keynes) did not engage with microeconomics at any point [1]. It was not until the 1970s and the Lucasian ra…

  11. comment
    Comment #14674261

    > there's no way to disable objective-c interop Believe it or not, this compiler option is named `-disable-objc-interop`. > Could someone explain why I should build a language deve…

  12. comment
    Comment #14231570

    You misunderstand my argument, and OP's. I'm asserting something like "our children will be protected from firings when they express an unpopular opinion." This would be a regulati…

  13. comment
    Comment #14228638

    The problem with "the freedom to exclude" is that the same argument underpins, for just one example: racial segregation. If the blacks want to go to the movies, well then they can …

  14. comment
    Comment #14198947

    That's not relevant. You said: > you won't find any reputable study on the web where the average person lost 10%+ of their body weight and kept it off for five years. Not even one.…

  15. comment
    Comment #14196251

    > Moreover, you won't find any reputable study on the web where the average person lost 10%+ of their body weight and kept it off for five years. Not even one. Of course there is: …

  16. comment
    Comment #14033136

    iOS's permissions model is patented [0]. It takes some lawyer trickery to implement something that doesn't run afoul of the patent. [0] https://www.google.com/patents/US8646100

  17. comment
    Comment #13676567

    This is already being done. Swift 4 (unreleased) has source compatibility with Swift 3 [0], so all Swift code working today should work in the next version, no migrator necessary. …

  18. comment
    Comment #13528572

    > So: do you want to grow the ecosystem around your software or not? In short: of course not. Or at least "not at any cost". Open source projects do loads of things that reduce the…

  19. comment
    Comment #13526099

    > will impede adoption of the software they cover I think this is really the core of the issue. For someone to "adopt" my software but not contribute in any way (whether that be pa…

  20. comment
    Comment #13408493

    Most people do pay dumb amounts of money for content. They pay their carrier for the bandwidth to download the ads. That's in the ballpark of a nickel per page [0]. You can't say t…

  21. comment
    Comment #13405624

    The term is based on a figurative bug being found. OED traces this usage to > Mr. Edison, I was informed, had been up the two previous nights discovering ‘a bug’ in his phonograph—…

  22. comment
    Comment #13276411

    All models are wrong, some models are useful . And what is useful is subjective. The Newtonian model works brilliantly at human-scale resolution. But if you are a quark, it is tota…

  23. comment
    Comment #13252750

    The primary reason I moved things off GitHub was to self-host. If I wanted someone else to host it I would probably go back to GitHub.

  24. comment
    Comment #13252739

    Right, but your licensing is per user per year. I add 50 NEW users in a month. Each of them use the product for about 20 minutes, but I believe I would need to license them for an …

  25. comment
    Comment #13251249

    Hi sytes. Thanks so much for this. I was active on the thread trying to get it added to CE, and it makes a big difference. One thing GL is still missing in its licensing model is a…