Viewing profile — dougk16
dougk16
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 26, 2012, 6:17 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,211
- Public activity
- 407 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dougk16
Hello, my name is Doug. You probably just read a witty yet insightful comment of mine and want more...
BLOG: https://aytwit.com/blog
I also make cool educational Engineering/DIY videos...
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBgtpu1QDRAAA8QvsL68E1A
Here's a crazy personal portfolio site I made. The engine is reusable for other sites if you're interested...
PORTFOLIO: https://dougkoellmer.com
Contact me anytime about anything, but especially to be of service...
EMAIL: doug@aytwit.com
nttjbxmv9trm
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35155135
Let's say I sent up a key "foo" to get the value "bar", and I did this again and again. Will either "foo" or "bar" be encrypted to the same ciphertext again and again? Or is there …
-
comment
Comment #34758391
I'm adding to your comment and not trying to argue (unless you want to!): There's no distinction between the public and the government. The government is made up by the public. And…
-
comment
Comment #34359602
Really great list. Thank you. Some of these I wasn't even aware of. I've been using Session for about a year. A year ago it definitely had some missed messages and I was about to d…
-
comment
Comment #34089592
Capitalized, yes. It should also have air quotes. "Effective Altruism" is more appropriate in this case.
-
comment
Comment #33712810
One solution to this is to become an oracle at your company. Any time someone (namely someone higher in the company who is responsible for your pay) has a question, no matter how m…
-
comment
Comment #33461674
For all the bigger companies I've worked with that have infinite war chests and rely heavily on user data and analytics, the question is always why shouldn't a specific metric be t…
-
comment
Comment #33285419
Well, yea. Living things and organizations have incentives. The implication I gleaned from your original comment was that Google's incentive to avoid bad press on HN for its App St…
-
comment
Comment #33285241
Google is a vast, schizophrenic organization. They're big enough that they have different teams and internal politics fighting each other all the time. It's not a unified conscious…
-
comment
Comment #33284143
Google does some pretty surprising levels of static analysis of compiled source, particularly surrounding their API usage. There's a few examples I've run into but the first that p…
-
comment
Comment #33160342
I dismissed it all very early on but for other reasons. I took one look at the BTC whitepaper way back, saw that every transaction and wallet was completely public, and immediately…
-
comment
Comment #33157718
I would continue easily dismantling your points but you're like a boomer railing against the Internet in the early 90s. It's bad according to your value system so other people shou…
-
comment
Comment #33138695
Ah c'mon gimme something better to chew on, this argument is cake to dismantle. (1) You don't use Monero to buy breakfast. It's for large money transfers so at least compare it to …
-
comment
Comment #33115921
Monero and other less well-known currencies solve all of that. You can say it's bad or useless for other reasons. But my direct experience with dozens of P2P transfers, outside exc…
-
comment
Comment #33028501
Money is the goal of the individual Cogs in the machine. Control is the goal of the machine itself, which uses money to incentivize (power) its Cogs. If you're a Big Tech company y…
-
comment
Comment #32583559
Yup. My hypothesis is unambiguously verifiable, and I've verified it to my own satisfaction through my personal experiences. Your hypothesis is not unambiguously verifiable, only s…
-
comment
Comment #32559970
Again, you're assuming they don't have surrogates. This is still an assumption. The miscommunication here is that you think I'm a conspiracy theorist or something, and I think you'…
-
comment
Comment #32554468
We're both making the same number of assumptions. The difference is that yours is in the negative and mine is in the positive. Your example about the risk of someone leaking to the…
-
comment
Comment #32553662
The even more simpler explanation is that it's both.
-
comment
Comment #32500713
Fellow DERO holder I see. ;)
-
comment
Comment #32389016
Another possibility is they want to keep eyes off tech that people would go to in droves if they outright banned it. They want to avoid the Streisand effect. Part of that play is i…
-
comment
Comment #32327721
They've coded for 10 or 20 years, and now just sit back and design interfaces, write specs, evaluate technologies, mentor juniors, do code review, and of course the ultimate mind b…
-
comment
Comment #32268773
Very nice! I hope to soon get to the point where I need this. I'm bookmarking this.
-
comment
Comment #32267804
Cool idea, I can see how this would be useful once you're dealing with more than a few invoices per month. For those like me that do indeed only send out a few a month, I've found …
-
comment
Comment #31814131
Agreed with the vibe of other comments here. It's hard not to come off snobby, and the market won't allow such snobbery forever, but for now the reality is that a senior engineer i…
-
comment
Comment #31617250
Nice, quick implementation. It's cool that it's all client side. People have pointed out the weaknesses as far as non-crushes brute forcing the answer but still this is interesting…