Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — doug_durham

doug_durham

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jun 01, 2017, 11:13 PM UTC
HN karma
1,015
Public activity
504 items

About doug_durham

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49198120

    No one knows the ramifications. They won't be known for many years. That's the way software has always worked. No one knew the ramifications of the internet.

  2. comment
    Comment #49197980

    I could not agree more. Thank you for stating this. Software Engineering is about building things. You don't do it for status, you do it for passion. There are a lot of unhappy ind…

  3. comment
    Comment #49146662

    Most popular fiction is formula entertainment like Tom Clancy novels. Tom Clancy novels are their own industry now. I have zero doubt that AI tools can generate countless variation…

  4. comment
    Comment #49117084

    What is the purpose of copyleft when there are tools that can generate equivalent code? Copyleft keeps software free by using copyright to protect the effort of human creators. If …

  5. comment
    Comment #49049592

    Code was always expensive. Entire industries of design tools cropped up simply to avoid writing the wrong code since it is so expensive. There are entire journals dedicated to this…

  6. comment
    Comment #49049317

    How can there be tons of evidence for a 3 year old technology? Everyone seems to think that all writers using AI are one shotting their content. A writer can carefully edit and rev…

  7. comment
    Comment #49049269

    The heuristics you are looking for are "editorial" and "curation". That's why there are things like newspapers and magazines. The world has always been awash in more low effort con…

  8. comment
    Comment #49049216

    That's not what the author is saying at all. You are presuming that AI is capable of generating original thoughts. The author's point is that original thought is what matters. If a…

  9. comment
    Comment #49040980

    It doesn't have perfect traction. It stumbles in the videos. This is consistent with other wheeled robots that have come out the last few years.

  10. comment
    Comment #49040936

    An alternate framing for these types of "the old web was better" articles is: "I really liked the web better when only privileged, highly educated people could put up content". The…

  11. comment
    Comment #49025204

    I so don't have time to revisit books that I've already read. I'd probably be embarrassed by my earlier naiveté.

  12. comment
    Comment #48993950

    The whole resource argument against AI is quickly becoming obsolete. Time to move on to a new argument.

  13. comment
    Comment #48953898

    Can you provide reasons other than "he's wrong"? There is no other technology that compresses so my knowledge into such a small space. A 24 GB diffusion model can generate a good a…

  14. comment
    Comment #48951402

    Most of the discussions I've read about AI is as a tool. There is a narrative being created that its all about replacing humans. I've not seen that outside of a view influencers.

  15. comment
    Comment #48951374

    I don't think you can make the absolute statement that there is no audience or market for these tools. I enjoyed watching all of these videos. They are far from banal crap. They ar…

  16. comment
    Comment #48908228

    Handwriting is inherently ableist. A portion of the population is blessed with the inherent ability of fast, legible handwriting. A portion of the population is not. Typing is an e…

  17. comment
    Comment #48899235

    The same way that I verified all of the code that was written before AI. Just because you hand type the code doesn't mean that you don't have to test and verify. I can test much mo…

  18. comment
    Comment #48899215

    Sorry but you are just wrong. Perhaps if you are working on tiny problems in very small projects. Beyond that AI is simply many times faster regardless of how fast you type.

  19. comment
    Comment #48899169

    You seem to have a narrow definition of "build it". LLMs don't have agency. If I build software using an LLM I built it. Just like if I build a house out of lumber from a lumber mi…

  20. comment
    Comment #48897864

    The llm is the better community tool. The important change is that you don't have to settle with someone developing a monolithic tool that happens to do what you need it to do. Tha…

  21. comment
    Comment #48894290

    I don't agree that Anthropic's position is AI is all you need. My interpretation is that it's about developer acceleration. I've been following their messaging closely and it's not…

  22. comment
    Comment #48893944

    The point of cursive was make writing efficient with a quill pen. With a quill pen you run the risk of ink dropping off the tip if you lift it from the paper. Therefore cursive tri…

  23. comment
    Comment #48873859

    Unfixable errors? Why unfixable? Python is Turing complete. I can see difficult to fix, but not unfixable. LLMs lower the bar to refactoring code mistakes.

  24. comment
    Comment #48873827

    I don’t believe that “reasoning” is very useful in large code bases written by multiple developers. If you are trying to be axiomatic and prove to yourself that the code is correct…

  25. comment
    Comment #48873789

    I’m sure in certain domains this makes sense. However, English is a poor language for doing reasoning in. More and more I’m relying on the code itself as the documentation. One of …