Viewing profile — dirtbag__dad
dirtbag__dad
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 8:05 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 169
- Public activity
- 87 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dirtbag__dad
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49177184
I think you’ve missed the point of clean code if this is your gripe with it. Every time you over scope a function signature, because you want to handle that other case, you add men…
-
comment
Comment #49058800
> The actual problems in the code I work with are not the spaces at the end of line or imports in non-alphabetic order, it's the 10-line list comprehensions that are so long that t…
-
comment
Comment #48973377
If you can lock down a test suite that ensures parity, then who cares what shape the lift ultimately looks like. A full rewrite in different language that fails to be idiomatic is …
-
comment
Comment #48867089
Golf courses don’t have backup generators running 24/7, with humming you can hear from a meaningful distance away. They also don’t pollute the air. This is a poor comparison, but I…
-
comment
Comment #48840120
> My main project right now is to establish a framework for large-scale, unsupervised code generation in our codebase Anyone else working on something like this or know of any proj…
-
comment
Comment #48741189
Yes, same, between the two of them I feel like results are just better because they have different priorities. At the same time, I’ve invested in tooling that prints and lints arch…
-
comment
Comment #48667857
> in some areas, especially customer-facing sales, we expect to keep adding to our teams to support future growth Can someone help me understand why sales is immune to this strateg…
-
comment
Comment #48653095
> the code it produces is slop, but that’s more the fault of the model than the harness not being a good judge on if a step in the workflow resulted in a net improvement or complet…
-
comment
Comment #48345948
You can get really far with the 20x Claude Code and Codex plans. They are many orders of magnitude cheaper than api calls.
-
comment
Comment #48165164
Is anyone else troublingly addicted to your code agents? I’m constantly thinking about work because work is “just wrapping up” always now. I go to see one thing is done, outside of…
-
comment
Comment #48129810
I guess what I’m saying is that there is no “primary” goal, but rather a mix of things to consider, where it working at all as expected is just table stakes.
-
comment
Comment #48116780
> I don’t like senior developers who like trying new technology. I like ones that avoid more complexity. I guess the author has never worked on a dog shit system with no tests at a…
-
comment
Comment #48116717
Good architecture is not about the patterns you pick. It’s about having a team dev cohesively on any pattern(s) - programmatically enforce your style with in-house linters and scaf…
-
comment
Comment #48116669
> The ultimate goal of software is to solve the immediate problem at hand. The secondary goal of software is to solve likely future problems with as little work as possible. Not re…
-
comment
Comment #48057192
> Also, when did we stop liking to learn? Says who? One of the most enriching things about coding with agents is I have them provide new information, tools, patterns, whatever as a…
-
comment
Comment #48057070
Build CLIs your agents call, that scaffold what you want, and lint so it actually does achieves your intended design. Markdown files are a good reference but they are a weak enforc…
-
comment
Comment #48003333
There’s too much in this article to comment on it all, but if we zoom into the first claim: > An increase in the complexity of the surrounding systems to mitigate the increased amb…
-
comment
Comment #47884111
I guess this is the case for new installs, but for existing dependencies can’t you simply pin them to a patch release, and point at the sha?
-
comment
Comment #47843318
Has anyone used this for debugging? Like an error in datadog triggers an agent sandbox and branched database?
-
comment
Comment #47716937
I watched the demo video on the git butler home page and agree with the premises that: 1. git is not going away 2. git UX is not great So i appreciate their effort to manage develo…
-
comment
Comment #47651310
> Tests created a similar false comfort. Having 500+ tests felt reassuring, and AI made it easy to generate more. But neither humans nor AI are creative enough to foresee every edg…
-
comment
Comment #47625424
Yes. This seemed to be more cost effective.
-
comment
Comment #47622617
This. I have effectively used multiple agents to do large refactors. I have not used them for greenfield development. How are folks leveraging the agentic swarm, and how are you ma…
-
comment
Comment #47622599
I was a Cursor loyal until I was spending around $2k a week with premium models and my team had a discussion about whether we’d want to use more Cursor over hire another engineer. …
-
story
Ask HN: Where are legit examples of agentic coded products or software?
I believe people when they say they’re running 10 coding agents concurrently. I also believe them that their local setup loaded with the “best skills out there” makes their product…