Viewing profile — dewyatt
dewyatt
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Nov 21, 2013, 12:30 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 421
- Public activity
- 134 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dewyatt
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49222601
It seems to me that if you end up adjacent to an operation that exposes you to certain technologies, you will be harassed and attacked with covert directed-energy weapons until you…
-
comment
Comment #44556630
I think it's more likely we'd see term limits and balanced budget amendments. Possibly even the power for states to override federal laws, with a supermajority. I'd like to see oth…
-
comment
Comment #44546475
We've drifted pretty far from the Constitution and what the Founders envisioned. The reinterpretation of the Commerce Clause was the start of a downward spiral. I'm hoping the Conv…
-
comment
Comment #44546338
Tor doesn't protect against traffic correlation last I checked. Mixnets/Nym are better for actual privacy. (I've not audited Nym, not an endorsement)
-
comment
Comment #43430923
Example: https://www.theblaze.com/news/general-mark-milley-pentagon-a...
-
comment
Comment #33575624
> To rule out if it was a coding error, I tried to decompress the gzip file with bash via gzip -dc file. bash threw a strange error, “can’t seek file descriptor” when trying to rea…
-
comment
Comment #33471803
BPC-157 is the only thing that helped me with my debilitating tendinitis. It was definitely worth it for me, nothing else worked.
-
comment
Comment #20606127
They had warships when the 2A was written, some of which were privately owned. They also had things like the puckle gun and the founders were aware of advancing weaponry.
-
comment
Comment #20561303
Hmm maybe they'll add something later. It does have smartcard support, so that may be one approach.
-
comment
Comment #20557360
I just went ahead and placed my order anyways. :)
-
comment
Comment #20557231
The product page does not completely agree with all of these tech specs: https://shop.puri.sm/shop/librem-5/
-
comment
Comment #20523974
It seems like you're proving his point.
-
comment
Comment #20493732
If you enjoy this type of stuff, you may also enjoy some urban exploration videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheProperPeople
-
comment
Comment #20478149
I'm not sure what you're implying, but without context, the screenshot is meaningless. It could be that Phil has a policy of not storing private keys on his iPhone or something. Is…
-
comment
Comment #20463669
Yes, it depends on what you mean. The packets themselves aren't a big deal to me, it's more the ability to construct them in arbitrary ways that concerns me.
-
comment
Comment #20459805
> Every well-known bad cryptosystem eventually sprouts an RFC extension that supports curves or AEAD, so that its proponents can claim on message boards that they support modern cr…
-
comment
Comment #20459766
I can probably agree on the packet format, it's excessively flexible and easy to implement insecurely.
-
comment
Comment #20459758
> PGP theater Hmm I don't see it as theater if you are unable to intercept and decrypt my message. Or forge my signature, etc.
-
comment
Comment #20459304
This is more an issue with GnuPG though, not OpenPGP. Also, you may want to try using an actual OpenPGP Card ( https://www.floss-shop.de/en/security-privacy/smartcards/13/... ). (Y…
-
comment
Comment #20424257
Real ID gets us much closer to having a national ID. Give it time.
-
comment
Comment #20397793
Much of that could be solved by an implementation having user-controlled policies that whitelist/blacklist sets of algorithms. An implementation could be made with a sane default p…
-
comment
Comment #20382121
As I've mentioned before, AEAD was added to the RFC bis and a number of implementations support it.
-
comment
Comment #20361834
The OpenPGP RFC bis does add AEAD. The spec is overall much too flexible IMO and could use some modernization, but I don't see it as un-salvageable, as you seem to.
-
comment
Comment #20343834
Just put Bayesian and Rust in the title. :)
-
comment
Comment #20238635
They got you to click on the link though, didn't they?