Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — deepfriedchokes

deepfriedchokes

HN member
Joined
Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 10:21 PM UTC
HN karma
545
Public activity
325 items

About deepfriedchokes

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49160487

    I think the “end of history” idea was sold to the public in the same way and for the same reasons they were sold trickle down economics. Totally agree on the racism. I do hope the …

  2. comment
    Comment #49089962

    If police can lie to the public because free speech then the reverse should also hold true.

  3. comment
    Comment #48948273

    “Rules for thee but not for me” is the narcissist’s core value.

  4. comment
    Comment #48782873

    Privatizing the USPS would disproportionately harm those who vote for the politicians who are advocating for privatization, which would track.

  5. comment
    Comment #48738229

    Props to their marketing team. Here we are talking about it just like they wanted.

  6. comment
    Comment #48728612

    She should sue and get a ruling on this kind of intimidation in order to protect the free speech of others in the future.

  7. comment
    Comment #48700286

    What you are describing is Narcissistic Personality Disorder behavior. It is psychological abuse.

  8. comment
    Comment #48639196

    This stuff is probably inevitable since economics will drive data collection. What we really need is a digital bill of rights to protect everyone. Recording in public without conse…

  9. comment
    Comment #48438401

    It’s some Sun Tzu shit. Create a sense of inevitability such that they win the war for financial capital without any fighting, then hope the tech catches up before Capitalists real…

  10. comment
    Comment #48301757

    You are correct ESOP was what I was thinking of. Thank you for the correction. Worked great for Bob’s Red Mill I believe. Glad to hear it’s been a success for you and your company.…

  11. comment
    Comment #48298971

    We should be encouraging employee stock purchase plans with tax incentives. [0] It’s better for the businesses and better for our communities than PE. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/…

  12. comment
    Comment #46920238

    A lot of this AI stuff seems to be about creating a feeling of inevitability along with FOMO among investors who don’t know any better, while hoping the tech catches up to the expe…

  13. comment
    Comment #46890504

    This is a systems problem, not a human problem. It was inevitable that any weaknesses in the system would eventually be exploited. We should focus on fixing the system so this cann…

  14. comment
    Comment #46882791

    The most likely outcome is that no one will be punished for anything in the Epstein files.

  15. comment
    Comment #46882744

    Probably this bit on page 4, which parent comment addresses: “More efficient cooling architecture taking advantage of higher ΔT in space.”

  16. comment
    Comment #46832873

    This should not be legal.

  17. comment
    Comment #46818436

    I think at some point it would be more useful to talk about this and other behavior by this administration from a mental health perspective.

  18. comment
    Comment #46817386

    Sounds pretty invasive for privacy, if this was ever paired with smart glasses in public.

  19. comment
    Comment #46773379

    No Apple Pencil Ultra? What a missed opportunity.

  20. comment
    Comment #46762243

    Capitalists only care about capital. Witness how fast the DEI stuff was jettisoned once it was determined to be unprofitable under the current administration.

  21. comment
    Comment #46740030

    Would this count as libel? It’s a publication of a false, damaging statement in a fixed form (writing, print, picture, broadcast) that harms a person's reputation, exposing them to…

  22. comment
    Comment #46671584

    Regarding option (2), isn’t SCOTUS supposed to rule on the legality of Trump’s tariffs soon?

  23. comment
    Comment #46656172

    “In 1969, Schenck was largely overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio, which limited the scope of speech that the government may ban to that directed to and likely to incite imminent law…

  24. comment
    Comment #46595389

    Won’t this destroy any small seller who can’t compete on price?

  25. comment
    Comment #46547276

    Probably sexual division of labor.