Viewing profile — danieltanfh95

Probably good to note that this person is building his own language: https://inko-lang.org/

> NATS control-plane events: stream leader election / R3 quorum re-form during pod churn. this is perfectly understandable?

Why would they waste their time in peer review?

NGL AI usage is driven by friction in presentation and communication over petty details.

> my "cover" here became the discussion itself My "cover" is good because of X, their "cover" is bad because of Y, is not a helpful analogue nor a useful one.

Outsourcing your ability to think to "the community" is pretty much the same as handing it over to AI. AI is trained on the community. Argumentum ad populum.

what do you even mean to "not put a cover" on it, everyone communicates differently. Your comment here puts on a "snide, snarky, trying to be smart but failing" cover that I have d…

1. because your belief that AI-generated text is worse than human written text is flat out illogical and wrong. 2. judge content not by its cover and think.

That's a skill issue, not a technology issue.

> develop your game with offline playability in mind from the beginning > players churn on their own without social features you say one thing but the market votes the other way. G…

wrong, the commission did discuss with SKG, but the entire group had their head in the sand when reasonable people asked SKG to respect technical reality and resubmit a better, rea…

you are conflating the idea of "living with something" with the notion of "being alive". You live with your car/computer/phone. Like it or not, they change your life.

This was planned as a submission to the Gravity Research Foundation for 2027. The Dirac Spinor equation is extremely standard, and GR would be the more famous one. The only "leap o…

Thanks for being honest, at least.

> The demand for software most certainly has an upper limit. No, it does not. There is no ceiling for complexity.

This is multiple logical fallacies in one comment and definitely a comment I would mark in the "pure nonsense" bin. Not all criticism is slop, but anything ad hominem (personal att…

Understanding goes both ways. OP was just sharing something they thought was interesting. The Ted Chiang piece was horribly written logically and yet it was "written well" in prose…

Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no…

Exploring if it makes sense to use maths (or, to be precise, this particular construction) to drive content addressable content + other exploration around the memory space. IMO, no…

Then why even insinuate that these are similar? It's just using it to heavily suggest it is crankery.

There is nothing physics/metaphysics about this. If you don’t understand the terms, don’t pretend you do and write slop as a comment, it is really not that different from using LLM…

This isn’t about whether the writer uses LLM or not at all, nor is it about respect. The core novelty it tries to introduce is not hard to understand (even if it is not really that…