Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dagwieers

dagwieers

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 25, 2012, 11:51 AM UTC
HN karma
72
Public activity
24 items

About dagwieers

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #19999838

    It wasn't abandoned, it didn't see any maintenance for 18 months. I don't get paid for doing this work. Red Hat does. They get paid for offering it to customers that apparently dem…

  2. comment
    Comment #19992995

    It has played out as it did, that's why I closed the project. I don't have any wishes. Just a bad aftertaste but that will go. I don't like to dwell in the past, regardless of the …

  3. comment
    Comment #19992927

    That's not exactly what happened, but great to see you are making improvements in your fiction-writing skills :-) Keep it up !

  4. comment
    Comment #19992806

    Maybe because it is the nice thing to do? And it's not like I have disappeared from the face of the earth. I am quite active on GitHub.

  5. comment
    Comment #19992658

    Well, I had to find out this was planned and acted on after the decision was made and the alternative was written without any regards of the original project. And that is fine if i…

  6. comment
    Comment #19991329

    I am not really complaining, maybe unsatisfied of the direction it took and the consequences to other distributions without having a say. But maybe people fancy the new PCP Dstat a…

  7. comment
    Comment #19991297

    And where is the lie? Maybe you should read the announcement and leave it at that.

  8. comment
    Comment #19991283

    I am not sure what you are implying here. I have zero interest in maintaining the project. This was the last blow to a dying project. The king is dead, long live the king.

  9. comment
    Comment #19991232

    There was a discussion in the Github issues. From that it was pretty clear this was a done deal. If the project is no longer maintained, why would they. And they had the PCP reimpl…

  10. comment
    Comment #19991041

    Is that what happened? I remember it differently...

  11. comment
    Comment #19990470

    Thanks :-)

  12. comment
    Comment #19990468

    Unfair in what way? They included in RHEL and sold it as part of their product when it suited them, and now they have replaced it because it suited them. That's fine, I don't have …

  13. comment
    Comment #19990444

    Huh? Jumping to conclusions while not knowing all the facts. Please read up on the discussions that we had _after_ Red Hat made this decision. Their decision was made, end of discu…

  14. comment
    Comment #19990421

    Nobody stepped up to maintain the project, not even Red Hat. Some people have offered help, and I have send out a few GitHub invitations to people that offered, but no takers. I as…

  15. comment
    Comment #19988043

    It didn't just slip their mind, they did not really care: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614277#c7 The decision to do this was made before June 2018, 18 months after …

  16. comment
    Comment #19987934

    Who lied about this ? It's pretty clear we didn't accepted any PRs since December 2016 until Red Hat decided to replace our code, which started early June 2018. That's 18 months. I…

  17. comment
    Comment #19987921

    As part of archiving the project, I closed all open issues and PRs. That was what Github recommended me to do and I deemed best for everyone involved.

  18. comment
    Comment #19987920

    18 months

  19. comment
    Comment #19987470

    Yeah, I added python 3 support after I learned that was the main reason for replacing it. It took me less than an hour to make it work on Python 3, including all (but 2) of the plu…

  20. comment
    Comment #19987456

    Yes, and the plan to do this was conceived before June 2018.

  21. comment
    Comment #19987410

    What language ? It is being quite factual really.

  22. comment
    Comment #19987398

    Sure, and Red Hat being paid for RHEL shipping Dstat for a decade could have helped out. But instead they decided to replace it. And as a result I don't see a point continuing a pr…

  23. comment
    Comment #19987272

    > community developers requesting access to help were being ignored This is not true, I have not been contacted. I learned from Fedora's decision to replace Dstat with PCP months a…

  24. comment
    Comment #14927981

    It feels like reiserfs all over again.