Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dabeddabed

dabeddabed

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 12:32 PM UTC
HN karma
6
Public activity
16 items

About dabeddabed

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38673445

    ctrl+f+"knockout" doesn't give me a hit, in what sense are the cells used knockouts?

  2. comment
    Comment #38670151

    I see, sad those potential edits will be missed from appearing in the article, still could I ask you anyways to expand about "landmark results, open problems" ?

  3. comment
    Comment #38629598

    What would you add on the article about the Markov spectrum? Wikipedia can be edited by anyone

  4. comment
  5. comment
    Comment #38037644

    Never mind I think it means the Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture

  6. comment
    Comment #38033915

    "...automorphic forms, which have their own version of the Riemann hypothesis." What's the Riemann hypothesis for automorphic forms?

  7. comment
    Comment #37970932

    Right that is nice point I wouldn't have think about if you hadn't draw my attention there, well that was all I will be not taking more of your time, thank you very much for answer…

  8. comment
    Comment #37968800

    I think it makes sense but I also what I said before so if these really can't be compatible then I'm still confused, what I believe is that non superposing states should be a subse…

  9. comment
    Comment #37966091

    Would be incorrect to consider the example where there is no superposition like a special case of the island with no entanglement? Because you should be able to classically simulat…

  10. comment
    Comment #37960343

    Thanks for clarifying, reading your first comment again you say that you can cook up quite easily some other examples of islands like the 3 ones in the article, for the sake of cur…

  11. comment
    Comment #37954792

    Ah I see, searching a bit I think you're referring to multipartite entanglement ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipartite_entanglement ) don't understand much from what is writt…

  12. comment
    Comment #37950282

    If circuits without T-gates have zero "magic" and circuits without swap gates have no "interactivity" then circuits without what gates will have no entanglement? can it be characte…

  13. comment
    Comment #37043799

    Don't worry I spotted your answer 4 days late. Had to read the intro to the paper to understand what you were pointing to me (in fact maybe I should have tried before asking my fir…

  14. comment
    Comment #36938729

    Sincere question, the article as you do mentions the connection with the Hadwinger-Nelson problem too but I still don't see quite well how they are related, how could one pose them…

  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #36785265

    Supercool, thanks!