Viewing profile — d3ckard
d3ckard
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 24, 2016, 7:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,578
- Public activity
- 314 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About d3ckard
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48411827
Controversially, yes. The right frame of comparison is not towards average Joe, but towards governments. Billionaires, for better or worse, are independent power sources, which IMO…
-
comment
Comment #48411521
We invented those strategies when we had way less RAM. Vast majority of programs could be entirely allocated upfront those days.
-
story
Ask HN: What Is Anthropic Doing?
I'm without words with Opus 4.7. This is possibly the biggest quality regression of a computer product since Windows Vista. Or maybe ever. So, here is my question to the community:…
-
comment
Comment #47846551
I'm using almost exclusively Apple Maps in Poland and never had any issue (that I remember). Your mileage may vary and so on.
-
comment
Comment #47797528
Disputable. One could argue that artificial nature of US cities (i.e. lack of centuries of accumulated decisions) were bigger driver of this than cars themselves.
-
comment
Comment #47589922
No, you don’t. It only sounds nice. In practice this enables all kinds of spontaneous prosecution with any possible motive.
-
comment
Comment #47578963
They very much want to have manufacturing, since it’s a requirement for war. They just don’t realize it. Plus, it is a conflict between all the extra money to spend and long term s…
-
comment
Comment #47577399
It's not advantage, it makes for artificial demand for your currency, which completely screws up all the relevant metrics and makes you unable to actually inflate the currency when…
-
comment
Comment #47577384
Under normal conditions, when your economy becomes less competitive, your currency gets depreciated, increasing competitiveness. Unless of course everybody is forced to buy your cu…
-
comment
Comment #47576081
This is particularly funny if you consider petrodollar to be a bad deal for US, not a good one. Ironically, if yuan becomes new petroleum currency, it might hurt Chinese long term.…
-
comment
Comment #47441122
How about not starting a war? Especially as a sudden attack during negotiations? With a country that has been historically bending backwards to find some kind of diplomatic solutio…
-
comment
Comment #47438558
Yes, especially murdering a school full of girls during the first days seems like a perfect example of extensive planning and preparation.
-
comment
Comment #47329425
Yes, Betamax is undoubtedly the future.
-
comment
Comment #47315651
False dichotomy. What ICEs are or aren't has zero impact on whether BEVs are the future.
-
comment
Comment #47310712
It’s very disputable whether BEVs are industry’s future and your entire thesis depends on it to be true.
-
comment
Comment #46809618
The main issue IMHO is the monopolization of the industry, especially in the US. Once the giants do layoffs, the rest of the market can't absorb the people effectively, which leads…
-
comment
Comment #46755836
I would argue effectiveness point. It's certainly helpful, but has a tendency to go for very non idiomatic patterns (like using exceptions for control flow). Plus, it has issues wh…
-
comment
Comment #46423836
Yes, but allocations generate ever increasing combinatorial space of possible failure modes. Static allocation requires you to explicitly handle overflows, but also by centralizing…
-
comment
Comment #46423338
Personally, I see dynamic allocation more and more as a premature optimization and a historical wart. We used to have very little memory, so we developed many tricks to handle it. …
-
comment
Comment #46423007
Nice correction :) It’s actually quite tricky though. The allocation still happens and it’s not limited to, so you could plausibly argue both ways.
-
comment
Comment #46422567
Personally I believe static allocation has pretty huge consequences for theoretical computer science. It’s the only kind of program that can be actually reasoned about. Also, not e…
-
comment
Comment #45973723
Problem does not lay in not declaring wealth.
-
comment
Comment #45973716
Because only poor people need income. If you have enough assets, income is optional.
-
comment
Comment #45973704
You don’t get it. Tax system is already very skewed to the top, as in majority of the income comes from a few. The problem is that the top paying those taxes are not the rich peopl…
-
comment
Comment #45969509
Eroding them is beneficial to other groups of society, not the rich. It's like with corporations. Corporations love complex legal systems, as they are the only ones with money to d…