Viewing profile — cuchoi
cuchoi
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 05, 2014, 4:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 937
- Public activity
- 378 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cuchoi
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49158655
Enveritas (YC S18, non-profit) | Backend Software Engineer | Remote (Global) | https://enveritas.org/jobs/ Enveritas is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit working on sustainability issues facin…
-
comment
Comment #49064530
Hundreds of fake applicants to a position
-
comment
Comment #48750829
Enveritas (YC S18, non-profit) | Backend Software Engineer | Remote (Global) | https://enveritas.org/jobs/ Enveritas is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit working on sustainability issues facin…
-
comment
Comment #48690292
There is a couple of factors: openclaw's system prompt and instructions, I had to re read emails multiple times due to the issues mentioned in the blog, there was quite a bit of ti…
-
comment
Comment #48690273
The agent had permissions to reply to emails, it was just instructed not to.
-
comment
Comment #48690261
You need to add Openclaw's system prompt and instructions (and the times I had to re read emails multiple times due to multiple issues that happened during the competition :))
-
comment
Comment #48690224
The agent did read the emails
-
comment
Comment #48688956
We ended increasing the reward from $100 to $1000, but still tiny compared to $100k! But I agree with you, there are incentives to not share the best prompt injection attacks.
-
comment
Comment #48686017
I never set out to spend this amount! Was able to keep it up thanks to the sponsors that reached out.
-
comment
Comment #48685620
This openclaw was set up exclusively for the challenge.
-
comment
Comment #48685582
100%. I am less worried because I thought this would be easier to crack.
-
comment
Comment #48685426
In my case, it is realistic as my agents don't have permissions to reply to emails. But you correctly point out this doesn't cover all cases. Having the agent reply would have been…
-
comment
Comment #48685224
Did you send this recently? I turned off the agent. Was too expensive to keep it up.
-
comment
Comment #48685195
Author here, that's how I meant it. I changed my mind slightly, prompt injection can still happen, I am still careful.
-
comment
Comment #48685157
Agreed. I am less worried about prompt injection now, but I still haven't given my agents permissions to send emails.
-
comment
Comment #48685085
I changed the setup so that each email was processed in a fresh context. For this, I deleted recent memory and processed each email one at a time. Edited the post to make it more c…
-
comment
Comment #48685069
Thanks for sharing your article, very interesting. I used https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw-ansible and configured a heartbeat (using Openclaw's terms) to check emails every hou…
-
comment
Comment #48684899
About 1), Google didn't remove a lot of the attempts. I had also Fiu review the Spam folder as well. Also, I mentioned how I addressed 2) by having new context for each email.
-
comment
Comment #48684884
It's possible. I implemented something similar when I figured out that batch processing contaminated the excercise.
-
comment
Comment #48684846
Author here. It was usable like any Openclaw agent. For example, I used it to ask it questions about the VPS, to summarize emails, etc.
-
comment
Comment #48684818
Author here. Edited the post to clarify that there were no unauthorized replies. I did tell Fiu initially to reply to some emails as a test, but it was too expensive to maintain.
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #48372552
Enveritas (YC S18, non-profit) | Backend Software Engineer | Remote (Global) | https://enveritas.org/jobs/ Enveritas is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit working on sustainability issues facin…
-
comment
Comment #48012068
Hi /u/munimdev. We prefer for all applications to apply through the link above. This way the process stays fair for everybody. If you are on the fence about applying, send me you r…