Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — csee

csee

HN member
Joined
Fri, Oct 22, 2021, 8:37 AM UTC
HN karma
1,399
Public activity
675 items

About csee

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #31933008

    How do these IEMs with their passive seal compare to active noise cancelling headphones for the purposes of unwanted noise attenuation

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #31847530

    Sure, if we're talking about sampling, which is analogous to co-pilot copy and pasting chunks of code verbatim (which we've seen happen). But the complaints about co-pilot go far d…

  4. comment
    Comment #31847445

    I don't understand the difference between Co-Pilot on the one hand and Moderna (on the shoulders of medical research) or SpaceX (on the shoulders of physics knowledge and cumulativ…

  5. comment
    Comment #31847395

    This is how it always works, though. Moderna is standing on the shoulders of centuries of cumulative human knowledge without compensating all the sources of that knowledge. Musicia…

  6. comment
    Comment #31846933

    Your comparison fails a test of facts. Yandex actively censors any perspective not approved by the Kremlin. Google does not do anything comparable to this.

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #31846191

    It'll be as falsifiable as many other questions that historians grapple with (e.g. did famine X lead to conflict/instability Y?), but only once the warming has happened and we're l…

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #31834521

    It's not just on the apps. Evolutionary psychologists have a bunch of empirical studies that tease this out. We also see this in our genetic lineage, more female ancestors than mal…

  11. comment
    Comment #31833601

    > I can also assure you perpetual futures would not be allowed to trade on any exchange inside the legitimate financial system. I don't disagree that the point of perpetual futures…

  12. comment
    Comment #31832334

    It's happening, though, so it's not impossible. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-cyprus...

  13. comment
    Comment #31832320

    > For short term storage (hours/days) batteries are far more efficient. Is that expected/known to be true even as the tech gets cheaper in 5-10 years? What's the level of confidenc…

  14. comment
    Comment #31831247

    The alternative is the way things were 15 years ago, where people found mates via their physical networks, work, family, hobbies, religion, and day to day life. The criticism is si…

  15. comment
    Comment #31825584

    That is the only way out on a local, personal level, since that's all we have much control over. But how is it not the app's fault? When Twitter and Facebook create social dynamics…

  16. comment
    Comment #31825127

    You give good advice but I was commenting on the well documented asymmetry and inequality in outcomes that cut across gender lines which are likely magnified by these dating apps. …

  17. comment
    Comment #31824967

    Maybe not that extreme but it's a super well documented phenomenon across evolutionary psych and studies of dating app stats.

  18. comment
    Comment #31824924

    For the top few percent of men.

  19. comment
    Comment #31819635

    You make a good point about discarding the source of random noise that the one-time pad is being applied to, and just focusing on the thing that's generating that one-time pad. But…

  20. comment
    Comment #31818711

    If the observable universe is too small, what about the observable universe sampled at multiple points in time? Or just an iron bar that's repeatedly sampled along a time interval,…

  21. comment
    Comment #31812317

    What about the arguments outlined in the article? You first dismissed the arguments because an iron bar couldn't have enough physical states. But we both accept that there are phys…

  22. comment
    Comment #31811611

    "To achieve a persistent mapping for a significant time you'd probably need an iron bar something like size of the observable universe" But the observable universe exists. So why c…

  23. comment
    Comment #31811508

    Why do you think it's absurd? If we do eventually create an AGI that is significantly smarter than us in most domains, why is it that we should expect to be able to keep it under c…

  24. comment
    Comment #31811196

    Are they observer independent? From the article: "Of course it is simplest to build a computer where the high voltage states correspond to 1s and the low voltages states 0s or vice…

  25. comment
    Comment #31790661

    "AI is not going to ... destroy the world." Bare assertion fallacy? This question is hotly debated and I don't believe it can be so easily dismissed like that. It is not obvious th…