Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cmeacham98

cmeacham98

HN member
Joined
Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 1:16 PM UTC
HN karma
6,239
Public activity
1,446 items

About cmeacham98

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49222076

    Some ads (e.g. I know YT ads used to be this way, haven't looked recently) can't be blocked at the network level because they are served from the same domain/servers as the content…

  2. comment
    Comment #49195454

    While the EU and its member countries can't (or at least morally shouldn't) force people to make the product, if it was a priority they could incentivise it with funding, tax break…

  3. comment
    Comment #48978255

    Yes actually, I know someone who did business with them many years ago (before the advent of LLMs), although for a smaller sum than the advertised top payouts (the vulnerability th…

  4. comment
    Comment #48915981

    The difference comes from the fact distro maintainers choose the software they package, while language maintainers largely don't. For example, how do you prevent somebody from phis…

  5. comment
    Comment #48899411

    I think you also misunderstood, they are suggesting OP redirect to a telegram domain that isn't on the .me TLD, as the other .me is potentially at risk of also being taken down.

  6. comment
    Comment #48652471

    You continue to dance around this question on this post - did you or did you not follow Google's open source approval process[1]? Did you have an approved Ariane/Launcher2 entry? 1…

  7. comment
    Comment #48614105

    I don't have the time to audit all the code in a JavaScript runtime myself, so I am forced to make assumptions about the quality of the code based on my trust of the authors. Addit…

  8. comment
    Comment #48601593

    The problem is Google appears to label this as a security feature. I'm fine with the feature existing, but it should say something like "require Chrome" or "block Firefox" not "req…

  9. comment
    Comment #48594275

    The website labels it as a prompt, so probably a prompt

  10. comment
    Comment #48500211

    But you are Russian, right? I obviously have no idea to the extent GregKH has verified this, but a trivial scan of your online presence revealed to me you at minimum speak Russian …

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #48347399

    It actually astounds me this is getting any number of upvotes on HN at all - it's so obviously LLM written (or at minimum heavily edited) that it's written in markdown on a platfor…

  13. comment
    Comment #48116732

    Correct. Example snippet from the nytimes.com robots.txt: User-agent: archive.org_bot Disallow: /

  14. comment
    Comment #47993791

    > Linux adopted Win32 because it actually worked. Completely untrue - Linux "adopted" Win32 because the majority of video games are written for Windows (and thus Win32). They could…

  15. comment
    Comment #47550956

    So if social media removed personalization from their algorithms and only applied them broadly across large demographic groups you'd be fine with them? (Genuine question I'm curiou…

  16. comment
    Comment #47360562

    Is this a troll comment? How could the dialogue in the OP possibly be unclear under any context?

  17. comment
    Comment #47329394

    KYC is generally a force for good because it prevents fraud. While it is not reasonable for Discord to collect your identity that is a fair requirement for a bank account because m…

  18. comment
    Comment #47238804

    What you're describing is called a "worker cooperative" and they are somewhat rare but do exist already in real life.

  19. comment
    Comment #47203948

    An LLM can neither understand things nor value (or not value) human life. *It's a piece of software that predicts the most likely token, it is not and can never be conscious.* Beli…

  20. comment
    Comment #47133025

    What? No. An LLM cannot reason, at least not what we think of when we say a human can reason. (There are models called "reasoning" models as a marketing gimmick.) TFA describes a p…

  21. comment
    Comment #47056449

    While the operator did write a post, they did not come forward - they have intentionally stayed anonymous (there is some amateur journalism that may have unmasked the owner I won't…

  22. comment
    Comment #46936677

    We cannot know for sure but I think it's reasonably likely (say 50/50). Regurgitating an LLM for 90% of your comment does not inspire trust.

  23. comment
    Comment #46936555

    It's not a peer review it's just AI slop. I do agree they don't seem to be intentionally posing as an MS employee.

  24. comment
    Comment #46893129

    While the product sounds mildly interesting, I see it as a major red flag you think it's ok for either a submitter or reviewer to not even read the code they are working with and s…

  25. comment
    Comment #46467259

    Financing a phone is dumb for most people imo, but at least it has an explicit end where you own the phone outright. This phone requires a subscription in perpetuity, on top of the…