Viewing profile — clowd
clowd
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 22, 2016, 1:35 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 237
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About clowd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42797215
While we're talking about stuff that didn't happen, I'm sure glad the Steelers are headed to the Super Bowl.
-
comment
Comment #38987065
They're putting these crappy ads e-v-e-r-y-w-h-e-r-e. The quality of ads on YouTube has fallen to somewhere beneath the sewer, just as YouTube has launched a scorched-earth campaig…
-
comment
Comment #38358879
...towards reality. The "free speech absolutist" guy got his little feelings hurt again.
-
comment
Comment #36672691
> “If you want to build something people will use, don’t build anything,” he said. “Build an ad and see if people click it. Then only build something once it gets a lot of clicks.”…
-
comment
Comment #36622314
There's no indication that Trump is a multi-billionaire but the rest of your comment is spot on.
-
comment
Comment #36287737
And not a true one, either. I don't know what the hell Reddit is doing the past couple of weeks but they seem determined to completely destroy themselves, and quickly.
-
comment
Comment #35997443
O'Boyle isn't a whistleblower; he's an insubordinate employee who refused to do his job and was improperly distributing information about investigations.
-
comment
Comment #35768711
Will this not be subject to the same limitations reddit is imposing on RedReader and others? I guess I don't know enough about how they distinguish a "third-party app" versus a web…
-
comment
Comment #35757369
> If people use Firefox, they're probably a privacy wonk LARPing an imagined threat model, and are using a shitty cheap VPN used by countless attackers What kind of nonsense is thi…
-
comment
Comment #35744531
If Cloudflare has decided that Firefox is a "non-mainstream browser" and is applying a penalty to its users, then Cloudflare is the problem.
-
comment
Comment #35744343
Yes, this is annoying as hell. It's gotten to the point where I just close out of a site when I see that interstitial come up.
-
comment
Comment #35520168
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #35406359
Is your assertion that it's unconstitutional for the US government to regulate interstate commerce?
-
comment
Comment #35406345
Are you saying that the SacBee article is misrepresenting something to "manipulate" people? What does it purport to be true that's not true? The only problem GPT is fit to solve is…
-
comment
Comment #35348018
Complying with US federal law does not equate to acting as an agent of the US government, no matter how many times this trope may be repeated.
-
comment
Comment #35347984
The government hasn't created a list of no-no words, they've created a list of entities with whom US Persons cannot conduct financial transactions. I don't know what "ALEP" is but …
-
comment
Comment #34128804
Slight correction: alleging Donald Trump's government was doing unconstitutional acts. Which we know they did, in spades, in other contexts; but I've seen no evidence in the "Twitt…
-
comment
Comment #31701641
That one errors out with "Too much traffic" and this one doesn't.
-
comment
Comment #30667790
httpd is the one service I don't use fail2ban for, preferring a DIY solution instead. I created an Apache config file with rewrite conditions to catch a bunch of "exploity" URI par…
-
comment
Comment #29957961
> There should be nothing that TaskMgr can't kill Except Defender/Malware Protection...
-
comment
Comment #29774319
I don't think "everyone else" has been banned from Facebook; aside from Trump, I can't think of any other American elected official they've banned. Gab and Parler both work fine in…
-
comment
Comment #29773482
The pragmatic answer is: because the law says so. The technical answer is: Verizon can't hear what you're saying to your mom, so they don't know/care the content. The social answer…
-
comment
Comment #29773157
Every member of Congress is provided with their own website, a subdomain of either house.gov or senate.gov, for the entirety of their term. If your representative neglects that web…
-
comment
Comment #29773075
> It's like getting banned from radio in the 1940s and saying, "Who cares? There's still newsletters and speaking engagements." It's more like getting banned from one radio station…
-
comment
Comment #29745004
The Do Not Call registry is for mobile numbers too. The problems with the registry are twofold: - The robocallers DGAF. Many of them are already doing something illegal to start wi…