Viewing profile — cflynnus
cflynnus
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 23, 2014, 3:56 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 45
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About cflynnus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #35723353
I have no problem with the Tesla touchscreen. I don't want a car with physical buttons.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35244956
Thinking CBDCs are “safe” is extremely naive. They’re a dystopian nightmare. They’re every dictators wet dream. This is why Bitcoin matters. Bitcoin = freedom.
-
comment
Comment #34737367
It's not good money if it's properties can be changed, especially it's supply.
-
comment
Comment #33877860
If it's centralized it's garbage and it doesn't matter whatever its roadmap is. Also ETH wont implement sharding because its breaks composability. It's just marketing.
-
comment
Comment #33877814
https://danhedl.medium.com/bitcoins-security-is-fine-93391d9...
-
comment
Comment #33877794
That's dumb FUD. https://endthefud.org/control
-
comment
Comment #33877785
zoom out
-
comment
Comment #33876495
https://www.newsweek.com/bitcoin-mining-track-consume-worlds... "Bitcoin Mining on Track to Consume All of the World's Energy by 2020" Yep we've heard this all before.
-
comment
Comment #33876429
Gold standard was nixed because the government wanted to be able to create new money out of thin air and give it to itself. Simple as that.
-
comment
Comment #33876406
> the ruinous consequences if a Proof-of-Work-based currency were to rapidly overtake the current payment networks, in terms of the cost of electricity and environmental impact. ht…
-
comment
Comment #33876281
I don't care about securities law or what the US government does towards crypto. My point is that these ARE securities and bitcoin IS a commodity. When people truly understand this…
-
comment
Comment #33876259
Having a roadmap is no merit. A roadmap means the system is centralized because a core group of people can change the rules. If it's centralized it's not censorship resistant and t…
-
comment
Comment #33876251
> Bitcoin does not have Turing-complete scripting Feature not a bug. Base layer that will serve as foundation for entire global economy should be as simple as possible to make it a…
-
comment
Comment #33876210
IMO it applies to anything/everything "crypto" - it's all just unregistered securities lying/pretending to be commodities. It's all just scams. Bitcoin, however, truly is a commodi…
-
comment
Comment #33876181
Ethereum is a foundation of sand. The protocol and the rules change at the whims of the senior insiders. It's not a stable platform and since we don't know what the rules will be i…
-
comment
Comment #33464825
bitcoin fixes this
-
comment
Comment #32896748
It’s your opinion that what PoW produces is “waste” The markets disagree with your opinion
-
comment
Comment #32896730
> >In the stormy world of crypto, Bitcoin is the port. This is an idiotic statement. Bitcoin development has completely succumbed to corporate capture at this point by Blockstream …
-
comment
Comment #32896701
And yet it stores a lot of value…
-
comment
Comment #32847859
well the PoS fork tokens will acquire 99% the value of the current ethereum tokens, so if you want to access that you've got to upgrade your software. You are right tho you'll cont…
-
comment
Comment #32847829
> It's also a software upgrade because that $194 billion transaction only happens if enough users of the software have chosen to upgrade and run the new software by then instead of…
-
comment
Comment #32847797
In at least one nation state, El Salvador, Bitcoin is an option for buying a sandwich with.
-
comment
Comment #32847790
I don't think this is correct. The book "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier does a good job of covering this topic.
-
comment
Comment #32847774
Strongly disagree that PoW is a form of "shackles" PoW = bad is an Ethereum marketing narrative. The Bitcoin community has many robust counterarguments to this narrative.