Viewing profile — catigula

>Test coverage too low? Auto generate tests on CI for every pull-requests! Terrible use-case.

Github CI being down is catastrophically bad.

The great reversal is happening. It was about time to quell the bubble-sayers.

The idea that "knowledge work is mostly pointless" is absurd and only literally true specifically if AI can do it... which it seems to be able to.

Honestly, a lot of people are denying this, but the latest models ARE at the point where their systems design generally surpasses mine because they have a better grasp of how the d…

They literally told us it was about Israel. There's no mystery.

It took GPT-5.6-Sol Pro about an hour of work; don't thank me :P

I think the models are legitimately doing what they're good at; tireless search across an extremely large corpus of data. Humans aren't particularly good at this (in fact, they're …

Good news; I'm gifting you with the fruits of AI, that has collated 200+ papers on the topic. I know, I know; this is generous. https://github.com/catigula/recovery

Good news; I'm gifting you with the fruits of AI, that has collated 200+ papers on the topic. I know, I know; this is generous. https://github.com/catigula/recovery

All of that stuff is the norm in the industry. There isn't anything remarkable about it.

It's just a collation of sleep-end RHR/HRV. It's completely trivial and many manufacturers do this correctly; both are extremely reliable predictors of recovery metrics. Garmin has…

This notion that Dario cares only about the bottom line is simply misinformed, in the most charitable interpretation. It doesn't track at all with any of his prior stated beliefs o…

FYI combat vets are a counter example. They frequently kill a lot of people effectively. See: the DC sniper.

“We clearly can’t “trust” these companies not incentivized to randomly kill lots of people, so we might as well give everyone the ability to randomly kill lots of people”.

It’s interesting that most of the examples people making this argument give are high consequence, high difficulty (could you actually murder your coworker with a pen? I’m skeptical…

The ideas are dumb. They wouldn't kill anyone, the barrier to entry is too high and you'd trivially be caught and punished.

No, you don't. What stops people is actually access to knowledge. There are killers of varying levels of efficacy; making killing easier means more people die. It's 1-1.

You could literally develop a hyper-intelligent advisor on how to kill people or perform dangerous hacks using ablated 'open source' AI. You can do this right now, this very moment…

>According to the IAU working definition (from August 2018) an exoplanet can orbit a brown dwarf. It requires a mass below 13 MJ and a mass ratio of M/Mcentral<2/(25+√{621}), or ro…

I do the same kind of thing. "You're smarter now, time to try to cut down dumbo ChatGPT". High IQ bros.

[flagged]

I’m certain they did. The problem is… what are you going to do about it? This is obviously an idiotic and dangerous Cold War and has no happy ending.

Via sophisticated cyberattacks, which we know are now possible on an unprecedented scale without nation state resources or capabilities. Have you… have you been following the news …

You could, in theory, use an unbounded GPT-6 level model to basically destroy the world economy for many years.