Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — carbadtraingood

carbadtraingood

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jul 01, 2022, 6:28 AM UTC
HN karma
461
Public activity
119 items

About carbadtraingood

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #32226406

    First side (actually): "The term 'biological female' reflects a high school level understanding of DNA and genetics. Unfortunately, real genetics is much more complex, and many wom…

  2. comment
    Comment #32226350

    > attempting to be neutral is the same as joining the Philistines. This is a super common attitude across all areas of politics, that somehow being neutral is admirable or positive…

  3. comment
    Comment #32226195

    HN was never anything different than Reddit. The illusion that it is comes from people leaving Reddit looking for another online community that lines up with their interests, landi…

  4. comment
    Comment #32226085

    One side: "We should acknowledge trans people and let them live their lives" Other side: "We should arrest or do violence to trans people, because they are abominations, groomers, …

  5. comment
    Comment #32226008

    HN has always been a libertarian hell site with pockets of interesting people. The comments section has always had bad takes and good takes, it's always had jokes and memes. It has…

  6. comment
    Comment #32213906

    He's responsible for a gross oversight in safety that led to an injured child. There were obvious and simple safety precautions that were missed. This wasn't just, "whoops", this w…

  7. comment
    Comment #32211058

    Oh, that settles it. Robot cannot do things that are outside of the rules of chess. Kid should have known better than to open with the classic, "break my finger" opening from the r…

  8. comment
    Comment #32211039

    Yes, I'm going to make the outrageous claim here: children should not be expected to work next to industrial machinery with inadequate safeguards. I know this is controversial to s…

  9. comment
    Comment #32211016

    I disagree, if they are running the event, they are responsible for ensuring the safety of participants. You go skydiving and the chute fails in a totally predictable way, the comp…

  10. comment
    Comment #32211003

    Is it? Is the culture of Paris fairly homogenous? New York? London? Berlin? I would imagine the place has some shared cultural understandings, generally, but that a big city is goi…

  11. comment
    Comment #32210972

    Dude, children get antsy sometimes. They literally have different brain development than adults do. They do not have the same controls and inhibitions. Children are literally wired…

  12. comment
    Comment #32210945

    [flagged]

  13. comment
    Comment #32210926

    To be clear, any answer short of, "this was a failure on our part to protect the children who attended, and as the leader of the organization, responsibility falls on me. We will m…

  14. comment
    Comment #32209688

    Because the thesis is that automoderation is a problem. The entire point of the article is using Twitter as an example of a problem, not the root problem itself.

  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #32209674

    The answer from the federation is unconscionable. They blamed the boy and then said they could not be held responsible. Fuck off, a kid made a reasonable kid movement. If the robot…

  17. comment
    Comment #32203516

    Is it? Are you planning on running your own Daily Stormer or 8chan? It's not a slippery slope, it's not harder to run your own website. Don't extrapolate from a few extremist cases…

  18. comment
    Comment #32203462

    What? Even with the best moderation, humans will periodically brigade a site with awful content because they think it's funny to do so.

  19. comment
    Comment #32203446

    The article isn't about being banned on Twitter. It's about automated moderation (a side effect of which is, yes, a Twitter ban.)

  20. comment
    Comment #32203434

    Thailand has laws about how one can talk about the king, right? Maybe there's no safe harbor provisions for websites, and a site this size is too small to fight, but big enough to …

  21. comment
    Comment #32200902

    Ok, so you are saying current and increasing beef consumption rates are fine? I'm saying we should price the externalities into the cost of beef. What other solution is there?

  22. comment
    Comment #32195522

    No. We were nature, but we're progressing faster than natural processes can adapt.

  23. comment
    Comment #32195505

    What? I'm not sure what you are saying... We don't need to eat beef, both here and in Brazil. We choose to, in both places. We, locally, need to regulate harder and push harder glo…

  24. comment
    Comment #32193462

    "Need". We don't need to do those things. We choose to do those things.

  25. comment
    Comment #32193423

    We disagree, fundamentally. Amicably, I'm going to suggest these threads have run their course. Handshake and agree to disagree?