Viewing profile — calderknight
calderknight
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 17, 2023, 9:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 207
- Public activity
- 230 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About calderknight
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40325313
Yeah, if going that route the answer to the OP is "most people aren't using it for Lisp".
-
comment
Comment #40314115
Mystery solved! The answer to your OP is that the reason anyone can trust ChatGPT for code is that they use a much better model than the one you're using! GPT-3.5 is ancient and wa…
-
comment
Comment #40312686
ChatGPT is just the brand. I guess you're using GPT-4, but if you're using the default model (GPT-3.5) that would certainly explain below-expectation results.
-
comment
Comment #40304974
That's something you can easily prompt for, too.
-
comment
Comment #40303219
What model were you using? What prompt did you use? You can learn to trust it for some tasks that it's reliably good at. But for the most part, you don't trust it - you read throug…
-
comment
Comment #40260745
a few million years ago there were land mammals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Bathans_mammal
-
comment
Comment #40222860
Why not?
-
comment
Comment #40204219
leagues ahead of gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
-
comment
Comment #40190809
A USA made product
-
comment
Comment #39831689
To be clear, the best available version of Gemini has barely caught up with what OpenAI released over a year ago. Google's a year behind. They haven't really caught up.
-
comment
Comment #39725455
I don't think there's a contradiction between being something that just generates text and being something that does have thought processes and intention.
-
comment
Comment #39517553
Not logical. It doesn't follow from the assumption that the host would not pose the question "Hey, here's the car, wanna switch?" that the contestant would automatically lose. You …
-
comment
Comment #39517528
You can imagine factors other than his personality, but they're all equally as speculative. Additional rules to the game, for example.
-
comment
Comment #39515996
If the format of the game allows him to show the car to the player, how could his personality not enter into it? In every case where the player picks a goat-door, the host will be …
-
comment
Comment #39515779
I don't think your interpretation of the sentence is sensible. The sentence mentions that the host knows what's behind the doors. So, if he is allowed to open the door with the car…
-
comment
Comment #39515711
That's clear. Otherwise the question would just be about speculating on the host's personality.
-
comment
Comment #39515652
It's simple. To begin with it's 1/3 your pick is right. You know that a goat will be revealed. So it's absurd to suppose that the fact that a goat is revealed has increased the pro…
-
comment
Comment #39506371
longer
-
comment
Comment #39427019
I would guess the new chatbots have already stolen a bit of the market.
-
comment
Comment #39427009
worldcoin integration
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39323527
It does overlap a lot. Accelerationism is a cosmismist viewpoint and rejects the orthogonality thesis. In other words, it favours the construction of ASI even if it means the extin…
-
comment
Comment #39303170
I don't get interested when something says "I'm a really useful x". I get interested when it says "I'm a really useful x because y". You're the x I've been waiting for? Great, why?…
-
comment
Comment #39301414
is there an API? if so, how expensive is it to use?
-
comment
Comment #39284921
The students are using it anyway, so Oslo decided that teaching students to use it would be the best path. That way they can teach the students about the hallucinations and about e…