Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — cad31

cad31

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 04, 2024, 8:09 AM UTC
HN karma
10
Public activity
31 items

About cad31

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40228573

    This idea that projects are "confidential" is a classic for keeping employees on their toes and preventing them from asking questions.

  2. comment
    Comment #40228283

    Dammit this is so dumb. Half of google employees I know are literally racist against Chinese people. This is about China vs Israel, not a change in approach.

  3. comment
    Comment #40228246

    Let me fix this for you > Rule number one of being a rebel Work for the Empire. Just don't be surprised when you get fired, but complain about it anyway, because why not.

  4. comment
    Comment #40228203

    This has nothing to do with "a few years", and has everything to do with Israel being perceived as a US ally and China being perceived as an enemy. Basically nothing has changed.

  5. comment
  6. comment
  7. comment
  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #40141179

    I guess you are not a tiktok user...

  10. comment
  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #40072204

    By "enemies" you mean the sinking boat that e/acc people jumped out of, giving way for the next scam.

  13. comment
    Comment #40061053

    You are saying they are get paid to stay quiet about this kind of thing?

  14. comment
    Comment #40060911

    It is because the CIA is not using AI to create strike target lists.

  15. comment
    Comment #40060850

    I am with you but unfortunately the sense of "hacker" here is closer to what it is in "hackaton". A "hackaton" is an event where ivy league students compete to write sloppy code us…

  16. comment
    Comment #40060705

    Freedom to profit from war in privacy.

  17. comment
    Comment #40060628

    These are called sit-ins or "sitdown strike", and are not particularly uncommon. They happen in many democracies around the world (not at google though).

  18. comment
    Comment #39928375

    [flagged]

  19. comment
    Comment #39928361

    [flagged]

  20. comment
    Comment #39928333

    [flagged]

  21. comment
    Comment #39928316

    [flagged]

  22. comment
    Comment #39928311

    [flagged]

  23. comment
    Comment #39928270

    do you have any examples of a military using a statistical model that names targets, which were then killed without any human vetting?

  24. comment
    Comment #39928199

    [flagged]

  25. comment
    Comment #39928145

    [flagged]