Viewing profile — blisseyGo
blisseyGo
HN member- Joined
- Sun, May 31, 2020, 5:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 574
- Public activity
- 191 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About blisseyGo
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26351184
Is there a lite version of Google search? How does Lynx work for Google searches?
-
comment
Comment #26312086
Very interesting. How resistant would this be for hosting legal but controversial stuff? And what's to stop the peergos.me from dropping the said controversial subdomain? Can this …
- story
-
comment
Comment #26198046
You might find this useful: https://www.linuxbabe.com/mail-server/ip-blacklist-removal Especially the part about "Rule of Thumb for Running Mail Server on a New IP Address When you…
-
comment
Comment #26198020
> After that, pricing starts at $25 per month for up to 15,000 requests. This is very expensive for any decent usage. I have used tools like metascraper for this purpose and it wor…
-
comment
Comment #26061527
Unfortunately for me, I tried with 4 videos and all got: > The video is no longer available. If this is an unexpected error, please try again in a bit.
- story
-
comment
Comment #25106069
CTH is one place which never puts out any info without hard evidence to the documents which prove their case. Somehow that's not acceptable now a days. And despite this, there will…
-
comment
Comment #24814985
Are there any examples when big tech has "made a mistake" or "banned" someone on the lefty leaning side by mistake? I have countless examples of right leaning views get banned and …
-
comment
Comment #24814937
It goes much before that. Isikoff met Steele on Sept 22, 2016, and published a story about Carter Page the next day. He didn’t verify a thing. All he did was get an anon government…
-
comment
Comment #24784821
EDIT: dang, I understand my political views don't align with vast majority of HN but me replying to correct false info keeps giving me this error on HN: "You're posting too fast. P…
-
comment
Comment #24784761
I know this will get attacked for the source but this summarizes it well. There's numerous other examples too: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/npr-busted-framing-self-... The w…
-
comment
Comment #24784760
I know this will get attacked for the source but this summarizes it well. There's numerous other examples too: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/npr-busted-framing-self-... The w…
-
comment
Comment #24784745
> possibly faked or hacked emails What gives you the impression that this is the case? Hunter Biden's receipts from the computer repair shop are public for this too. I think bias m…
-
comment
Comment #24784732
Yahoo was the one who published the Steele dossier misinformation 4 years ago. Why are they better?
-
comment
Comment #24602545
It's not random YouTube videos. The videos are from 3 highly credentialed lawyers. Catherine Herridge is also a credentialed journalist for CBS News. Even NPR has reported this. Ye…
-
comment
Comment #24602530
Her wikipedia literally states her occupation as "Independent journalist". You would rather believe a journalist who I have clearly exposed as lying and biased with proof. Good luc…
-
comment
Comment #24596363
Using a random twitter account's narrative to "debunk" a well established lawyer for a 35 year military general and DOJ's declassified statements is not how things work in the judi…
-
comment
Comment #24596335
That's a court filing from Flynn's lawyer. Please watch these if you are really interested in learning about the case: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSwm32hsWAtRdktdmBtZC.…
-
comment
Comment #24596324
So now you are justifying FBI's actions of threatening someone's son to coerce a guilty plea? Coercion into pleading guilty is what we all should be complaining about but seems lik…
-
comment
Comment #24594743
It's not a random document. It's released directly by the DOJ and USAO Jeff Jensen. Everything which doesn't fit the narrative isn't "propaganda".
-
comment
Comment #24594722
You should watch this to learn the facts about the case: https://youtu.be/Tb2d9x0amuU Also: > "...the new disclosures demonstrate that Mueller’s prosecutors not only pressured Flyn…
-
comment
Comment #24526047
That's what was given to him in 2016 by the Senate which holds the power of giving or not giving a vote to the WH nominee according to the constitution: https://assets.documentclou…
-
comment
Comment #24525972
Because this time, most likely there will be a contested election. And because this time it's different because both the WH and Senate are held by the same party unlike 2016. SC ju…
-
comment
Comment #24525970
Fair point. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy.