Viewing profile — bitcoinmonger
bitcoinmonger
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 30, 2021, 2:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bitcoinmonger
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27232700
I don't know how anyone can defend cryptocurrencies after reading this lucid argument. I hope this provokes more discussion on the problem. Excellent work again from Stephen Diehl.…
-
comment
Comment #27232689
Electric vehicles are a disaster for the environment. The hype around them is insane.
-
comment
Comment #27205514
Correction: you need more energy than Norway to attack the system.
-
story
Ask HN: Why does Bitcoin use so much energy per transaction?
Why does it cost so much energy to make a single transaction? Can anyone explain why it's so inefficient, and why nobody has thought to try and improve it?
-
comment
Comment #27136019
Has anyone considered the environmental impact of electric vehicles? The electricity is generated in the most part by fossil fuels, so how are they in any way a green alternative?
-
comment
Comment #27128808
Why is this being downvoted? There needs to be a conversation about the inefficient energy usage of Bitcoin. Are we just going to ignore it?
-
comment
Comment #27115751
> How, exactly, would one argue that? Banks use energy.
-
comment
Comment #27115576
Why not just perform a 51% attack? That's the obvious weakness.
-
comment
Comment #27085521
This is a big win for the environment. Government currency dramatically reduces the amount of energy wasted in running a cryptocurrency, so this should replace them. Anyone advocat…
-
comment
Comment #27073974
Whilst simultaneously boiling the oceans.
-
comment
Comment #27056549
Are you suggesting that the energy usage of Bitcoin prevents attack, and that more energy usage would prevent government-scale attacks? This seems to insinuate that the energy usag…
-
comment
Comment #27029255
Quantum computers breaking the underlying cryptography. Governments can try and regulate it, but it wouldn't kill it.
-
comment
Comment #27024253
Why is this comment being downvoted? We need to have these conversations about energy usage until a solution is found.
-
comment
Comment #27015336
We need more people with years of experience in finance to warn against the risks of cryptocurrency. The existing financial system has been designed fairly and has systems in place…
-
comment
Comment #27014007
It's not quite the number of zeros. The hash digest is interpreted as a 256 bit integer, and this has to be below another 256 but integer (the target) for the block to be mined. So…
-
comment
Comment #27013968
This needs to be brought to an end. The energy usage of Bitcoin has been discussed ad nauseum, and I think we've all concluded that it serves no useful purpose. The current banking…
-
comment
Comment #26981970
You sound like you're the type of person who would enjoy working for yourself instead of for someone else. Have you ever considered it?
-
comment
Comment #26972718
Like rats off a sinking ship.
-
comment
Comment #26970759
It's safer for everyone if government controls the currency we use.
-
comment
Comment #26958188
It's security issues like this that are the reason why we should not allow anyone to have complete control of their money. Another nail in Bitcoin's coffin.
-
comment
Comment #26931940
I don't understand why Bitcoin has been designed to burn fossil fuels when it should just as easily be able to be run using green energy. Until this is changed I can't see cryptocu…
-
comment
Comment #26900285
Why is Bitcoin still allowed to exist? It's clear from the conversations over recent weeks that it's a waste of energy.
-
comment
Comment #26900174
Are we just going to ignore the environmental impact of Bitcoin?
-
comment
Comment #26879208
This will not be good for the environment.
-
comment
Comment #26863329
I don't think we want to live in a society where individuals have complete control over their money, which is was cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin enable.