Viewing profile — astazangasta
astazangasta
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 20, 2013, 6:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,702
- Public activity
- 1,253 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About astazangasta
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20437118
Actually, would you please ban me? I'm not sure i agree with you about ideology vs. curiosity, I'd say rather that ideology is one of the primary things I am curious about and some…
-
comment
Comment #20435953
It's not a hand wave - my argument is that those things could all be better developed, and indeed have been, by programs that are directly focused on that kind of technology develo…
-
comment
Comment #20435923
Yeah, where would we be without LASIK? I'll also note that that article notably elides things like ICBMs and the other myriad military applications, since it is clearly intended as…
-
comment
Comment #20435732
Most industries get their start in the military because that is where the money always is; however, semiconductors have definitely moved on to other applications, whereas rocketry …
-
comment
Comment #20435628
Space enthusiasts are always trying to sell their fetish with this line, but the fact is that technology development is not some generic facility; if you develop technology devoted…
-
comment
Comment #20435605
Exactly this; also, as a computational biologist I cringe at the stacking of dubious models that produced this "mapping". First is the "interactome", a terrible way to model biolog…
-
comment
Comment #20435312
I find those terms particularly perplexing because the idea of ridiculing people for their sensitivity to particular political concerns is an exercise in demonstrating your sensiti…
-
comment
Comment #20434228
This is in the category of "outrage outrage", where we are outraged that other people are getting outraged about things.
-
comment
Comment #20430322
I'm not sure what to do with this remark. You said my definition of social construction was untenable because the implications were too broad and you seemed to find that frightenin…
-
comment
Comment #20430190
Yes? And? This is one of the most profound and basic observations of twentieth century philosophy. That is what social construction is, it underlies our basic notions of perception…
-
comment
Comment #20430146
>Our definition of intelligence continues to refine itself to be a highly generalizable aptitude for certain abstract skills. This is exactly what social construction is: reifying …
-
comment
Comment #20430115
I'm guessing you are not a parent. I have a toddler and a one month old. It is rewarding in many ways, but it is also crushingly boring, repetitive work. It's also overwhelmingly p…
-
comment
Comment #20429832
Claiming success is a social construct seems to me to be trivially true, not a staggering claim. Intelligence is less obvious since there is a vast literature around it, but, again…
-
comment
Comment #20424042
This is garbage. Contrary to popular belief, remission is in fact common in schizophrenia, so n=2 demonstrates precisely nothing. In addition, there is no evidence that schizophren…
-
comment
Comment #20423746
No, this is not right. Most power generation is done by steam in the US (85%). Steam can get much hotter than boiling water, and it is cheap and makes no waste.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20404937
You're right, I didn't read enough or do enough back-of-the-napkin math. I read more; this seems plausible in life cycle terms, but now I have doubts about the economics. At $30/to…
-
comment
Comment #20404119
Thanos doesn't understand exponential growth. If you actually want to have an effect, cutting a population in half does nothing, it'll just grow back in whatever the doubling time …
-
comment
Comment #20404102
This is exactly the kind of logic that led to Silent Spring. "We think we have a viable solution, we haven't really evaluated any of the side effects, but we need to act, and act f…
-
comment
Comment #20403892
This seems like it would fail energetically; the amount of energy required to mine and transport a bunch of rock to a beach would surely exceed the amount of CO2 sequestered.
-
comment
Comment #20403180
The problem is that people routinely underestimate the scale of vested interest. Bill McKibben famously quantified the problem as the amount of actual capital (as in, can be used a…
-
comment
Comment #20402470
Like most grand theories of history most of this is only works as a result of approximation. For example, the Unification stuff appears to me to be pure garbage. There is no moment…
-
comment
Comment #20398101
Given the gaps in our knowledge of early life, a definite statement in either direction is unlikely to be in the offing. However, terrestrial life is decidedly unlikely. Life is de…
-
comment
Comment #20383903
This is idiotic. We don't need a recession to clear detritus from the economy, that should be the result of routine investment. We get recessions because the economy as a whole ove…
-
comment
Comment #20377244
>the same as the privacy populists who obsess about data, most of whom lived in advanced democracies in which the data isn’t used for serious assaults on people This observation be…