Viewing profile — amvalo

Was disappointed when I realized the author was not an actual doctor.

Do you remember what they were called?

Wrong how? Skewed R?

If he knew they were going to kill him why did he let them visit?

> the signs of this type of person are pretty obvious in retrospect What are the signs?

Why not just name the paper :)

> some other N. American immigration hypotheses (eg, that pleistocene peoples could make boats)]. Why were they so opposed to this? You can't leave us hanging... EDIT: ok and why i…

Fake story -- that's way too fast.

Yeah it’s all about the 3rd party who gets insulted. I have one friend whose brother is disabled and he’s told me off for using it, which I get. Transgression is part of the appeal…

So calling someone R*** is not allowed but calling them shit-for-brains is, though the intended meaning is pretty much the same.

> From what I understand, Parler was bankrolled and designed to do exactly what it was ultimately shutdown for. That is, be a concentrated anger-machine-echo-chamber. I'm not angry…

Ok, now I really wanna see a photo.

He does have the disclaimer

> how much of this nuance is achieved by having discussions about issues which have real life-or-death impacts on people but without having any of those people inconveniently prese…

The test has actually changed over the years and since people made a stink about the oarsman question, they’ve been more careful to reduce cultural bias (though I’m not convinced i…

What are you saying "No" to? This article says it may have been from the 80s?

Talking about the Oarsman-regatta thing? That was 2 decades ago...

That and... the war

Just because it's not engineered doesn't mean it didn't come from a lab. It could be a natural virus that was collected and escaped. The original SARS escaped no less than 3 times …

"Page Last Updated: 03/23/2020" Strange indeed. You said your test kit arrived already? What does it look like?

Yeah, and it's not listed... in the actual FDA database.

Until recently there were sites selling contact lenses (like visiondirect.co.uk) that would flaunt this rule, but visiondirect was recently being investigated for it so YMMV.

Yeah, after digging into it more I saw that. Doesn't explain the missing FDA number though which is quite sketchy.