Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — amaajemyfren

amaajemyfren

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 18, 2017, 2:25 PM UTC
HN karma
732
Public activity
98 items

About amaajemyfren

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #31375685

    Thanks for this. It is some really nasty stuff.

  2. comment
    Comment #31375678

    So you learn no? I'm sure the way fuel was carried during World War 1 is not the way the US Military carries it now. Special ships? That probably depends on the economics. If the E…

  3. comment
    Comment #31375573

    Fuel literally burns and it is carried by ship - I believe there is a way to safely ferry them in ships.

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #28987698

    I think like most things there is a balance. The sweet spot may be I can go hard on the project but if I feel like I need some time off - there is the ability to step back and have…

  6. story
  7. comment
    Comment #28559361

    For those like me who didn't understand initially : PTO ⩶ Paid Time Off

  8. comment
    Comment #28165220

    I'm not an expert here but it may be time for white box no name mobile phones that come with nothing that we have to set up ourselves. My second computer was the first time I downl…

  9. comment
    Comment #27782195

    You are not wrong and I agree but eventually I suspect there will be some project management (following up on peer reviewers, winnowing out the low quality papers, etc) that will n…

  10. comment
    Comment #27781993

    If that's the case, my suspicion is this may continue happening until a 'Netflix of scientific papers' appears. Even with Sci-Hub down it's likely someone else will replicate it.

  11. comment
    Comment #27781962

    Is there a sort of single sign on reasonably priced service that aggregates the many publishers of government funded papers in one place?

  12. story
  13. story
  14. story
  15. story
  16. story
  17. story
  18. story
  19. story
  20. story
  21. story
  22. story
  23. story
  24. comment
    Comment #26618777

    Rough consensus and running code!

  25. comment
    Comment #25645820

    Seems someone has responded to it. https://twitter.com/natfriedman/status/1346452935924846593