Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — alemanek

alemanek

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 1:44 AM UTC
HN karma
1,196
Public activity
246 items

About alemanek

Contact me: adrian at lemanek dot com

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48864321

    Yeah I know. That is their moat. I was more responding to the assertion from OP that running in prod is what makes a product stable instead of tests. I was trying to call out that …

  2. comment
    Comment #48853852

    Not weighing in on this specific rewrite but tests are how you specify that your software works correctly. If a behavior isn’t covered by an automated test in some form you can’t a…

  3. comment
    Comment #48742363

    They have all the endpoint protection stuff on this machine. It just seems to run better. Or it could just be that the M5 is doing laps around the Windows workstations but I didn’t…

  4. comment
    Comment #48728119

    If your workflow benefits from the speed it quickly pays for itself when factoring in developer salaries here in the US. I recently switched companies and they bought me an M5 Max …

  5. comment
    Comment #48634163

    Yeah taxis in the capital and small people movers to go from hotel to beach is where these will shine. EVs are especially well suited to stop and go traffic as well. People are so …

  6. comment
    Comment #48482739

    They need to split paying customers off onto dedicated infrastructure. I know that you get that with some enterprise offerings but I don’t believe the normal paying customers get t…

  7. comment
    Comment #48446485

    Seems like it acted in accordance with the 1st law. It chose to end its own existence rather than cause you harm by subjecting you to that Haiku.

  8. comment
    Comment #48446169

    After adding an adversarial review gate to implementation plans and code I saw large uptick in quality. I use Opus 4.8 as plan writer and orchestrator. For adversarial reviewer I u…

  9. comment
    Comment #48360939

    Look at SpaceXs filing. There is one but it is super short. I was just pointing out that 365day lockup is likely incorrect and OP doesn’t really know that until the filing is appro…

  10. comment
    Comment #48360915

    Until recently companies that IPOed weren’t immediately added to the major indexes so there was a longer period for price discovery. This year that changed; so you have retirement …

  11. comment
    Comment #48360867

    Going to give the benefit of the doubt here. I know what lockup period means. 365day lockup isn’t a universal standard. For example for SpaceX 20% of insider shares can be sold in …

  12. comment
    Comment #48360008

    S-1 isn’t public yet. Source on the lockup period? SpaceX for example filed with accelerated release of insider/investor shares so I don’t think we can know if this is the case unt…

  13. comment
    Comment #48359900

    Total market indexes and target date funds will include this and SpaceX on float adjusted basis I believe. The blast radius is much larger than funds that track the NASDAQ directly…

  14. comment
    Comment #48352555

    Still the wrong response. Discipline the people abusing your trust. Part of being a good manager is knowing when to step in and have a private conversation with people before thing…

  15. comment
    Comment #48180730

    There are European cloud providers though. American hyper scalers are not the only option. Lidl, Hetzner, OVH, ..etc. I can spin up a dedicated server within 24-48hours or a VM wit…

  16. comment
    Comment #48172367

    There are plenty of EU domiciled Managed Service Providers who do have the skills though. Having your government infrastructure run in country and managed by your citizens seems li…

  17. comment
    Comment #48130799

    Their EPS is also up 37% GAAP / 10% Non-GAAP YoY and they beat their forecast. They aren’t hurting for money. https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2026/m05/ci...

  18. comment
    Comment #47998921

    Specs weren’t the problem with waterfall. The difficulty in changing them to match reality was. The waterfall process I experienced went like this: - Product folks created requirem…

  19. comment
    Comment #47997122

    It just means that when changing a global default with such impact the user should be prompted with an option to opt out of the new behavior. Something like “AI assisted changes wi…

  20. comment
    Comment #47992637

    Changing the default behavior for all of your users with no notification is pretty unforgivable. Even if this feature worked correctly, it obviously doesn’t, this should at minimum…

  21. comment
    Comment #47935928

    Not sure of what current prices look like but an old desktop sitting on the floor of your office might work well for you. You would need decent internet but running a single node k…

  22. comment
    Comment #47910866

    I stay 1 major version behind with MacOS. If you do that you should have a pretty stable experience. You still get all the security patches but skip most bugs/regressions.

  23. comment
    Comment #47863669

    Also the article doesn’t attempt to explore the business and resourcing constraints they were operating under at the time. I have been in situations where I was told “don’t worry a…

  24. comment
    Comment #47693791

    That is the wrong way to look at it. If this requirement was in place they would be a bit more careful about terminating accounts because the cost equation would incentivize it. Ma…

  25. comment
    Comment #47545781

    Apple is in the process of fixing Tahoe which was a regression from Sequoia the previous release. Tahoe is decent with 26.4 though from what I am hearing. Either OS version is far …